How many papers support this gap analysis?

4 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2025.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

agriculture4 papersavg year 2025weak evidence

The need for a comprehensive understanding

Research gap analysis derived from 4 agriculture papers in our local library.

The gap

The need for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution and intellectual structure of green farming practices research. The lack of analysis on the development of themes within the area of study.

Evidence profile

Sourced from the abstract and stated research gap and future-work section of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2024 and 2026, spanning 4 journals. Those papers have been cited 52 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 5 representative gaps

A Comprehensive Analysis of Organic Food: Evaluating Nutritional Value and Impact on Human Health (2024) · Foods · cited 52× · doi
In recent years, organic agriculture has gained more popularity, yet its approach to food production and its potential impact on consumers' health and various environmental aspects remain to be fully discovered.
generalabstract
Keywords: recent years organic agriculture gained popularity approach food production potential impact consumers health various environmental
Bibliometric Review of Research on Green Farming Practices in Agriculture: A Global Literature Overview 2010–2024 (2026) · West Science Agro · doi
The need for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution and intellectual structure of green farming practices research. The lack of analysis on the development of themes within the area of study.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: need comprehensive understanding evolution intellectual structure green farming
Ecophilosophy of Semen Antonets, regarding organic farming as a method of non-traditional land use (2024) · Zemleustrìj, kadastr ì monìtorìng zemelʹ · doi
The paper identifies a gap in the current understanding of organic farming and its ecological implications. The need for a change in the worldview and the transition to a deeper level of understanding of existence is emphasized as a research gap.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: paper identifies gap current understanding organic farming ecological
Ecophilosophy of Semen Antonets, regarding organic farming as a method of non-traditional land use (2024) · Zemleustrìj, kadastr ì monìtorìng zemelʹ · doi
The paper suggests that future research should focus on the development of ecophilosophical teaching and ecological paradigm. The implementation of organic farming as a method of non-traditional land use should be further studied and promoted.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: paper suggests future research focus development ecophilosophical teaching
Identifying key management and environmental drivers of organic fertilizer-induced soil N 2 O emissions across North America: A meta-analysis (2026) · Environmental Research Communications · doi
Abstract Organic farming systems have expanded across North America, yet the drivers and magnitude of soil N 2 O fluxes remain understudied.
generalabstractevidence 4/5
Keywords: abstract organic farming systems expanded across north america drivers magnitude soil fluxes remain understudied

Questions about this gap

The need for a comprehensive understanding of the evolution and intellectual structure of green farming practices research. The lack of analysis on the development of themes within… This is supported by 5 representative gap statements extracted from 4 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.