The complexity of the legal framework as a challenge
Research gap analysis derived from 3 general papers in our local library.
The gap
The paper identifies the complexity of the legal framework as a challenge. The paper highlights the importance of understanding the legal aspects of construction contracts. The paper notes the lack of a comprehensive framework for determining the conditions for extension of time as a challenge.
Evidence profile
Sourced from the stated research gap and stated challenges and future-work section of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps
- Yargıtay İçtihadı Birleştirme Büyük Genel Kurulunun T. 16.05.2025, E. 2024/1, K. 2025/2 Sayılı Kararının Arsa Sahibinin Arsa Payı Karşılığı İnşaat Sözleşmesinden Dönmesi Hâlinde Yükleniciden Bağımsız Bölüm Satın Alan “Üçüncü (?)” Kişinin Hukuki Durumuna Etkisi (2026) · Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları dergisi · doi
The paper identifies a research gap in the analysis of the change in the jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation regarding the effect of the landowner's rescission of the construction contract on third parties. The paper aims to fill this gap by providing an analysis of the implications of the new decision for third parties who purchased independent sections from the contractor.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5Keywords: paper identifies research gap analysis change jurisprudence court - İNŞAAT SÖZLEŞMELERİNDE İDARİ SEBEPLE SÜRE UZATIMI (2026) · Ankara Barosu Dergisi · doi
The paper identifies the complexity of the legal framework as a challenge. The paper highlights the importance of understanding the legal aspects of construction contracts. The paper notes the lack of a comprehensive framework for determining the conditions for extension of time as a challenge.
generalstated challengesevidence 5/5Keywords: paper identifies complexity legal framework challenge highlights importance - YARGITAY’IN 16.05.2025 TARİH E.2024/1, K.2025/2 SAYILI İÇTİHADI BİRLEŞTİRME KARARI SONRASINDA ARSA PAYI KARŞILIĞI İNŞAAT SÖZLEŞMELERİNDE ÜÇÜNCÜ KİŞİLERİN TAPU SİCİLİNE GÜVENİNİN VE MÜLKİYET HAKKININ KORUNMASI (2026) · Hacettepe hukuk fakültesi dergisi · doi
Further research is needed to examine the effects of the new approach adopted by the Yargıtay on the protection of third-party ownership rights. The characteristics of construction contracts in return for land share and the effects of registration on the acquisition of immovable property ownership should be further analyzed.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 4/5Keywords: further research needed examine effects new approach adopted
Questions about this gap
Explore this gap further
Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Review it with us.
AI Review reads your manuscript in one pass with 8 specialist agents, calibrated on 69K+ real peer reviews.
Tools for your next paper
Related gaps in General
- The challenges of reconciling the validity of marriagesThe complexity of the Indonesian legal framework. The need to balance the protection of families with the principles of proportionality,…
- Ottoman modernization, which has traditionally focusedOttoman modernization, which has traditionally focused on institutional and political reforms. The study highlights the need for a more…
- How liberal Orthodox Jews construct their socialFurther analysis of testaments from other regions could provide a broader understanding of religious identity during this period. A…
- Recent research suggests that social categorizationRecent research suggests that social categorization is sufficient for group formation, contrary to the assumption that interpersonal…