How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

general3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The challenges of reconciling the validity of marriages

Research gap analysis derived from 3 general papers in our local library.

The gap

The study highlights the challenges of reconciling the validity of marriages originally conducted under non-Islamic religious traditions when both spouses subsequently convert to Islam simultaneously. The research identifies the need for a

Evidence profile

Sourced from the stated research gap and stated challenges and future-work section of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

ANALISIS STATUS HUKUM LGBT DI INDONESIA PERSPEKTIF AKSIOLOGI DAN FILSAFAT HUKUM (2026) · Al-IHKAM Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Jurusan Ahwal al-Syakhshiyyah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Mataram · doi
There is a gap in the existing research on the legal status of LGBT in Indonesia from the perspective of axiology and philosophy of law. The existing research has not analyzed the issue from this perspective. The study aims to fill this gap by analyzing the legal status of LGBT in Indonesia through the perspective of axiology and philosophy of law.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there gap existing research legal status lgbt indonesia
Dualisme Penetapan Itsbat Nikah atas Pernikahan Non-Muslim Pasca Konversi Agama di Pengadilan Agama (2026) · An-Nafis Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan · doi
The study highlights the challenges of reconciling the validity of marriages originally conducted under non-Islamic religious traditions when both spouses subsequently convert to Islam simultaneously. The research identifies the need for a more nuanced understanding of legal pluralism in Indonesian family law.
generalstated challengesevidence 5/5
Keywords: study highlights challenges reconciling validity marriages originally conducted
Tindak Pidana Kohabitasi dalam KUHP Baru: Antara Privasi, Moralitas, dan Penegakan Hukum (2026) · Binamulia Hukum · doi
Future research could explore the potential impact of the law on different segments of Indonesian society. Scholars could examine the effectiveness of alternative policies or approaches for addressing issues related to cohabitation and public morality. Further study could also investigate the role of morality in criminal law, and the potential implications for human rights.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research explore potential impact law different segments
Tindak Pidana Kohabitasi dalam KUHP Baru: Antara Privasi, Moralitas, dan Penegakan Hukum (2026) · Binamulia Hukum · doi
There is a need for more nuanced and effective policies for addressing issues related to cohabitation and public morality. The current law may not fully capture the complexities of the issue, and may lead to unintended consequences. Further research is needed to fully understand the potential impact of the law on human rights and Indonesian society.
generalstated research gapevidence 4/5
Keywords: there need nuanced effective policies addressing issues related

Questions about this gap

The study highlights the challenges of reconciling the validity of marriages originally conducted under non-Islamic religious traditions when both spouses subsequently convert to I… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.