How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

general3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The study identifies lack of knowledge about vaccination

Research gap analysis derived from 3 general papers in our local library.

The gap

The study identifies lack of knowledge about vaccination as a challenge to improving vaccination rates. The study notes that lack of knowledge about where to get vaccinated is a barrier to vaccination. The study highlights the need for incr

Evidence profile

Sourced from the future-work section and stated challenges of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 2 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

A importância dos imunobiológicos na prevenção de doenças prevalentes da infância: impactos da desinformação na cobertura vacinal e na saúde pública (2026) · Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos · doi
Future research should investigate the effectiveness of digital technologies in increasing vaccination adherence. The study suggests the need for further research on the impact of disinformation on vaccination coverage in different contexts. The research highlights the importance of developing communication strategies to reduce vaccine hesitancy.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research investigate effectiveness digital technologies increasing vaccination
Kiến thức, thực hành về tiêm vắc xin phòng bệnh cúm mùa của người từ 50 tuổi trở lên tại xã Bình Giang, tỉnh Ninh Bình năm 2025 (2026) · Tạp chí Y học Dự phòng · doi
Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of targeted interventions to improve vaccination rates among people aged 50 and above. Future research should explore the barriers to vaccination among the target population in more depth. Future studies should examine the impact of increasing awareness and education about the benefits of influenza vaccination on vaccination rates.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future studies investigate effectiveness targeted interventions improve vaccination
Kiến thức, thái độ và dự định tiêm vắc xin phòng vi rút hợp bào hô hấp của khách hàng tại Phòng tiêm chủng Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội năm 2025 (2026) · Tạp chí Y học Dự phòng · doi
Future studies should examine the effectiveness of the RSV vaccine in preventing respiratory infections. Future studies should evaluate the impact of promoting knowledge and positive attitudes towards the RSV vaccine on intention to receive the vaccine. Future studies should investigate the barriers to accessing the RSV vaccine.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future studies examine effectiveness rsv vaccine preventing respiratory
Kiến thức, thực hành về tiêm vắc xin phòng bệnh cúm mùa của người từ 50 tuổi trở lên tại xã Bình Giang, tỉnh Ninh Bình năm 2025 (2026) · Tạp chí Y học Dự phòng · doi
The study identifies lack of knowledge about vaccination as a challenge to improving vaccination rates. The study notes that lack of knowledge about where to get vaccinated is a barrier to vaccination. The study highlights the need for increased awareness and education about the benefits of influenza vaccination.
generalstated challengesevidence 5/5
Keywords: study identifies lack knowledge about vaccination challenge improving

Questions about this gap

The study identifies lack of knowledge about vaccination as a challenge to improving vaccination rates. The study notes that lack of knowledge about where to get vaccinated is a ba… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.