How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2007.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

psychology3 papersavg year 2007weak evidence

Research on the direct relationship between career

Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.

The gap

There is a lack of research on the direct relationship between career decision-making self-efficacy and employment self-efficacy. The study aims to address this gap by examining the effects of career decision-making self-efficacy and major

Evidence profile

Sourced from the stated research gap and future-work section of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1987 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 280 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Effects of Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy and Major Satisfaction on Employment Self Efficacy among Junior College Beauty Major Students: A Mixed-Methods Study (2026) · Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology · doi
There is a lack of research on the direct relationship between career decision-making self-efficacy and employment self-efficacy. The study aims to address this gap by examining the effects of career decision-making self-efficacy and major satisfaction on employment self-efficacy.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there lack research direct relationship between career decision-making
Self-efficacy expectations and coping with career-related events (1987) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · cited 140× · doi
The gap in current research is the need for a theoretical framework for analyzing how people cope with events that share salient characteristics with job interviews. The study identifies a need for further research on the effects of self-efficacy expectations and verbal persuasion on anxiety and performance in different contexts.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: gap current research need theoretical framework analyzing people
Self-efficacy expectations and coping with career-related events (1987) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · cited 140× · doi
Future research should examine the effects of self-efficacy expectations and verbal persuasion on anxiety and performance in different contexts. Future research should test the generalizability of the proposed path model to other critical work events. Future research should explore the implications of the study's findings for career counseling and coaching.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research examine effects self-efficacy expectations verbal persuasion
Examination of the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Job Search Anxiety: A Study on Young Adults (2026) · Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi
Future studies should aim to replicate the findings in different contexts and populations. Future studies should examine the mechanisms by which self-efficacy influences job search anxiety. Future studies should develop and test interventions aimed at enhancing self-efficacy and reducing job search anxiety.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 4/5
Keywords: future studies aim replicate findings different contexts populations

Questions about this gap

There is a lack of research on the direct relationship between career decision-making self-efficacy and employment self-efficacy. The study aims to address this gap by examining th… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.