education3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The framework emphasizes maqāṣid-based evaluation of AI

Research gap analysis derived from 3 education papers in our local library.

The gap

While the framework emphasizes maqāṣid-based evaluation of AI tools such as automated grading systems and learning analytics, there is insufficient guidance on specific methodologies for conducting such evaluations or measuring compliance w

Evidence profile

Sourced from the inline gaps and future work and open questions of the source papers, classified as methodology gap, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

  • Coping with AI: Islamic Principles for New Education Policy (2026) · Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE) · doi

    While the framework emphasizes maqāṣid-based evaluation of AI tools such as automated grading systems and learning analytics, there is insufficient guidance on specific methodologies for conducting such evaluations or measuring compliance with Islamic principles.

    methodology gapinline gapsevidence 5/5
    Keywords: framework emphasizes based evaluation tools automated grading systems learning analytics there insufficient guidance specific methodologies
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Pendidikan Islam: Peluang, Tantangan, Dan Etika Keislaman (2026) · Al-Abshor : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam · doi

    The paper asserts that AI can enable personalized learning in Islamic education contexts but does not specify what adaptive algorithms, student modeling techniques, or curriculum design frameworks should be developed to align personalization with Islamic pedagogical principles and character formation objectives.

    methodology gapfuture workevidence 5/5
    Keywords: adaptive learning algorithms student modeling personalization Islamic pedagogy character formation curriculum design
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Pendidikan Islam: Peluang, Tantangan, Dan Etika Keislaman (2026) · Al-Abshor : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam · doi

    The paper claims AI can improve digital literacy in Islamic educational contexts by training students to use technology responsibly, but lacks concrete curricula specifications for what digital literacy competencies should be taught, how Islamic values should be integrated into this instruction, or how student competency should be assessed.

    methodology gapopen questionsevidence 5/5
    Keywords: digital literacy Islamic values responsible technology use curriculum competency assessment Islamic education
  • INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION: ETHICAL, PEDAGOGICAL, AND SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVES (2026) · INTIHA: Islamic Education Journal · doi

    Professional development programs for Islamic educators to build technical skills and ethical literacy in AI tool application aligned with Islamic principles are recommended, but no curriculum frameworks, training duration specifications, assessment metrics for ethical reasoning, or effectiveness measures for such programs exist in the literature.

    methodology gapfuture workevidence 5/5
    Keywords: professional development teacher training ethical literacy Islamic principles AI competency spiritual mentorship

Questions about this gap

While the framework emphasizes maqāṣid-based evaluation of AI tools such as automated grading systems and learning analytics, there is insufficient guidance on specific methodologi… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Related gaps in Education

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.