You're in the right place. Paste your title and abstract and this check scans CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Europe PMC and Unpaywall, plus our 4.5M-paper library, for prior publication and duplicate submission — with a confidence score and the matching title/DOI for each hit. The same pass also returns your acceptance-probability tier, detected field, target journals, and the topics your abstract matched. Create a free account to run it — 25 credits to start, each run costs 15 credits.
Need a full peer-review report with detailed agent analysis and an editorial recommendation? Use AI Review Engine instead — 8 specialized agents + synthesis, for complete manuscripts.
Duplicate check — plus four more outputs in one pass
🛡️Prior-publication checkDuplicate / prior-publication scan across CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Europe PMC and Unpaywall + our library
🎯Tier verdictAcceptance probability across Top / Mid / Open-Emerging tiers
🧬Detected fieldYour field, detected from the abstract, which sets the acceptance-rate anchors
📚Target journalsRanked shortlist from 17,500-venue index — match score, open access, citation rate, similar papers
🔍Where to dig deeperThe topics your abstract matched, with a one-click handoff to the full Research Gap Finder
Creating an account is free, and new accounts start with 25 credits. Each Pre-Check / Journal Finder run costs 15 credits. Paste a title, abstract, and a few keywords and you get an acceptance-probability tier, your detected field, a ranked target-journal shortlist, and the topics your abstract matched — no PDF upload needed. Credits are bought in one-time packs and never expire.
The Top / Mid / Open-Emerging probabilities are estimated from where the most similar papers in the 4.5M-paper local library were published, scaled by per-field acceptance-rate anchors. It is a fast triage signal from your title and abstract, not a guarantee — an editor's decision depends on the full manuscript — and we have not published a measured accuracy for it. When too few of the similar papers sit in journals on our curated tier list, the odds are rougher: they lean on the Scimago quartiles of the journals those papers appeared in or, failing that, on the field's base acceptance rates. Treat it as a pre-submission gut-check; for a detailed editorial report on the complete paper, use the full AI Review.
It ranks a 17,500-venue index by how well your abstract matches each journal's recent papers, and shows match score, open-access status, a citation rate, and similar published papers. The index deliberately includes regional and Turkish TR-Dizin venues alongside the big names, so the shortlist isn't only elite journals. On a benchmark of 46 real papers, the true publishing venue appeared in the top 5 for 54.3% of papers and in the top 10 for 67.4%; per-field results, with 4 to 9 papers per field, are on the benchmarks page.
No upload — title, abstract, and keywords are enough for the triage. You do need a free account to run it (new accounts get 25 credits; each run costs 15), and we don't publish or share the text you paste. If you want a full review of the complete manuscript, that's the separate AI Review.
This page is a fast pre-check (15 credits): tier verdict, detected field, ranked journals, and a prior-publication scan from your title and abstract. AI Review is the full report — 8 specialist agents plus synthesis analyzing your complete manuscript with an editorial recommendation — and costs 30 credits. Everything is pay-as-you-go: buy credits in one-time packs, and they never expire.
No. The 17,500-venue index spans high-impact, open-access, emerging, regional, and Turkish TR-Dizin journals, so authors aiming at realistic or regional destinations get relevant matches, not just unreachable top-tier titles. Each suggestion shows its open-access status and an honest cites-per-paper signal rather than a single prestige number.