Science AI Journal
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Research topic

Open research questions in Economic and Environmental Valuation

374 gap statements mined from Economic and Environmental Valuation papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 2,686 papers on the topic — drawn mostly from each paper's own stated research gap, future-work, challenge and limitation notes, and its abstract. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one.

Choosing where to publish on Economic and Environmental Valuation? See the ranked Economics journals.

What the literature leaves open

  • Fifth, the non-owner sample is small, its lowest outcome category is sparse, and the Q25 estimate is not robust to every adjustment or binary threshold.

    Perceived Environmental Benefits and Electric Vehicle Intentions in Canada: Separate Analyses of Car Owners’ Purchase Likelihood and Non-Car Owners’ Stated Preference · 2026 · DOI

  • There is a need to quantify patient preferences and assess how technical aspects influence acceptance.

    Unraveling acceptance of healthcare innovations in neurorehabilitation: results from a discrete choice experiment · 2026 · DOI

  • Future research could examine these factors as potential moderators of preference. Future research could examine alternative distributional assumptions, observed interactions, latent-class models, or other mixture approaches to determine whether distinct consumer segments differ in their trade-offs among health, sustainability, food assurance, and price.

    Balancing Health, Sustainability, and Food Assurance in Fast-Food Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Taiwan · 2026 · DOI

  • Interpretation of the character interaction remains limited by the content overlap between the affinity measure and the character attribute. At the same time, the evidence is limited to a single country, a single online panel, and adults aged 20–49 and should therefore not be generalized beyond this context without further validation.

    Consumer Valuation of AR-Enabled Indoor Navigation in Shopping Malls: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis · 2026 · DOI

  • One limitation of this paper is that it does not explicitly address the issue of incentive compatibility, even though the role of the first CT is particularly important in this strand of the literature.

    Preference instability in stated choice surveys: More evidence · 2026 · DOI

  • Further investigation into the newer proof-of-concept methods identified is warranted, as these methods are still in their infancy more research is needed to validate their effectiveness. Moreover, research on the optimal presentation of choice experiment results to patients is also needed.

    Embedding a Choice Experiment in an Online Decision Aid or Tool: Scoping Review · 2025 · DOI

  • This subsection outlines actionable strategies to address the challenges identified in the discussion. The recommendations are organized into three key areas: optimizing participation mechanisms, innovating industrial upgrading pathways, and establishing long-term participation frameworks.

    Strategies for Coordinated Development Between Local Communities and the Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park: Case Study of the Hunchun Area · 2025 · DOI

  • At the end of discussion, the limitations of this study need to be mentioned: Firstly, due to the pandemic of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021, the university imposed strict restrictions on visitors, which meant that we could only recruit university students to participate in the experiment.

    The Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model for Exploring the Mechanisms of Pedestrian Route Choice · 2025 · DOI

  • Future research should focus on exploring perceptions among specific stakeholder groups directly affected by macaque activities, such as farmers and residents of areas with nuisance individuals or populations.

    Do You Give a Monkey’s? Unraveling the Conservation Value of the Endangered Long-Tailed Macaque (Macaca fascicularis) · 2025 · DOI

  • The cognitive burden on consumers is a challenge that needs to be addressed. The study needs to ensure that the choice experiment is closer to the natural situation.

    Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Rice Attributes in China: Results of a Choice Experiment · 2024 · DOI

  • Determining an appropriate path or solution for comparing the results regarding the valuation of the public goods of agricultural ecosystems across studies remains difficult. Methodological difficulties and uncertainty analyses could transpire during a comparison with the previous research. The study only considered a small part of environmental public goods from organic farming.

    Assessment of the Environmental Public Goods of the Organic Farming System: A Lithuanian Case Study · 2024 · DOI

  • Further research could investigate the valuation of environmental public goods in different countries and contexts. Comparing the results of this study with other studies on the valuation of environmental public goods could provide more insights.

    Assessment of the Environmental Public Goods of the Organic Farming System: A Lithuanian Case Study · 2024 · DOI

  • Ecological cognitive bias can lead to inaccurate perceptions of the environmental impact of rubber plantations. The lack of a sound rubber price insurance system can lead to persistently low prices for rubber, eroding rubber farmers' incomes. Managing rubber plantations in an eco-friendly way can be challenging due to the need to balance economic and environmental considerations.

    Impact of Ecological Cognitive Bias on Pesticide Reduction by Natural Rubber Farmers in China: Insight from Price Insurance Satisfaction · 2024 · DOI

  • Future research could address these limitations by combining longitudinal surveys, field experiments, or pilot contribution schemes with Bayesian modelling to examine whether stated contribution preferences correspond to actual financial behavior.

    Environmental Culture and Willingness to Pay for Clean Air: A Cultural Additivity Perspective and Bayesian Mindsponge Method · 2026 · DOI

  • First, respondents had limited information about each program, potentially making it difficult to fully assess the relative advantages of one protocol over another.

    Ranchers’ Preferences for Grazing Programs in the Voluntary Carbon Market: Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in the Great Plains and Front Range, USA · 2026 · DOI

  • Future research should explore whether digital health services designed according to these preference patterns are associated with improved engagement or clinical outcomes in real-world settings.

    Preferences for digital health services among patients with chronic kidney disease: a discrete choice experiment · 2026 · DOI

  • We believe the potential of the ICLV model in this field remains to be further explored and discussed.

    The Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model for Exploring the Mechanisms of Pedestrian Route Choice · 2025 · DOI

  • Using Limited Data to Identify Optimal Bag and Size Limits to Prevent Overfishing.

    Global Disparities in the Recreational Fishery Economy: A Systematic Review · 2026 · DOI

  • While innovative therapies that reduce transfusion dependence are emerging, little is known about how patients value such clinical benefits.

    Willingness to Pay for Temporary Transfusion Independence in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China · 2026 · DOI

  • Despite recognition of the importance of patient preferences in treatment decision-making, limited evidence exists on how individuals with AL value different treatment features.

    Patient Preferences for Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Leukemia: A Multinational Discrete Choice Experiment · 2026 · DOI

  • The participation rate of farmers around the nature reserves was not high. Multiple linear regression analysis will overestimate the income effect of ecotourism.

    Does Ecotourism in Nature Reserves Have an Impact on Farmers’ Income? Counterfactual Estimates Based on Propensity Score Matching · 2024 · DOI

  • To the best of our knowledge, few studies have specifically examined the preferences of healthy older adult citizens for a broad range of home care services in China.

    Healthy older adults' preferences for home care services · 2026 · DOI

  • This may be because other attributes were more important to them and they still have a higher degree of trust in health care providers to maintain confidentiality as compared to other groups, or possibly because the levels or alternatives were not well defined.

    Finding the Sweet Spot: Preferences for Effectiveness, Duration, and Side Effects in a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Uganda’s Key Populations · 2025 · DOI

  • This proves somewhat difficult, as the cost of reef conservation activities varies widely and it is often difficult to parse out costs of specific strategies from larger program and/or project budgets.

    Economic Values for Coral Reef Conservation and Restoration in Florida · 2024 · DOI

  • Limited recruitment options, - The sample was drawn from the German population, - The study did not include cost-attribute in the modeled interventions, - The study used a partial profile design, - The study did not include interaction effects in the experimental…

    Unraveling acceptance of healthcare innovations in neurorehabilitation: results from a discrete choice experiment · 2026 · DOI

Most-cited papers in Economic and Environmental Valuation

Most recent work

Find a gap in your own Economic and Environmental Valuation sub-topic

This page shows what the Economic and Environmental Valuation literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, search the Research Gap Finder: the search is free with a free account and lists the papers closest to your topic first. Unlocking that topic (50 credits, charged once) fills the comparison table from our 7.9M-paper local library and writes the gaps from its rows.

Open the Research Gap Finder →

Related topics in Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
1,278 open questions
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
819 open questions
Global trade and economics
660 open questions
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
616 open questions
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
581 open questions
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
568 open questions
Healthcare Policy and Management
554 open questions
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
512 open questions
Open questions raised by papers listed on this page include: (1) There is a need to quantify patient preferences and assess how technical aspects influence acceptance (“Unraveling acceptance of healthcare innovations in neurorehabilitation: results…”, 2026); (2) Future research could examine these factors as potential moderators of preference (“Balancing Health, Sustainability, and Food Assurance in Fast-Food Choice: A…”, 2026); (3) Interpretation of the character interaction remains limited by the content overlap between the affinity measure and the character attribute (“Consumer Valuation of AR-Enabled Indoor Navigation in Shopping Malls: A…”, 2026); (4) Future research should explore whether digital health services designed according to these preference patterns are associated with improved engagement or clinical outcomes in real-world settings (“Preferences for digital health services among patients with chronic kidney…”, 2026); (5) While innovative therapies that reduce transfusion dependence are emerging, little is known about how patients value such clinical benefits (“Willingness to Pay for Temporary Transfusion Independence in Lower-Risk…”, 2026). 374 gap statements have been mined from Economic and Environmental Valuation papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 2,686 papers on the topic; the gaps come from whichever of those papers state one. They are mostly the research gaps the authors state and the papers' abstracts, plus future-work, limitations and challenges passages. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one, so you can read the original claim in context.

Tools for your next paper

Gaps & Literature SearchFind open questions in any field — 1,100,000+ open gaps mined from our own library.Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? Acceptance odds for top, mid and open/emerging journals, in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck for prior publication across 7 sources and our local library.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.

How Pre-Check worksHow AI Review works

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.