Best journals for Biology
The top 40 of 3,604 Biology journals, ranked with primary-Biology journals first, then by Scimago quartile and OpenAlex cites/paper (2-year window), drawn from a 17,500-venue index. Predatory venues are excluded; the FAQ below gives the exact ranking rule. These are field-wide rankings — for a shortlist matched to your specific paper, paste your title and abstract into the Journal Finder (a free account starts with 25 welcome credits).
Data as of — the date our venue index was last rebuilt from OpenAlex and Scimago.
- 1Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology44.2 cites/paper · Q1 · Nature PortfolioScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6Pharmacological Reviews27.8 cites/paper · Q1 · American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 7
- 8
- 9Physiological Reviews24.1 cites/paper · Q1 · American Physiological SocietyScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 10
- 11Journal of Extracellular Vesicles20.8 cites/paper · Q1 · Taylor & FrancisOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 12
- 13
- 14Nature Communications18.3 cites/paper · Q1 · Nature PortfolioOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18Nucleic Acids Research17.2 cites/paper · Q1 · Oxford University PressOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety15.4 cites/paper · Q1 · WileyScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 25
- 26
- 27FEMS Microbiology Reviews15.0 cites/paper · Q1 · Oxford University PressOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 28
- 29Experimental & Molecular Medicine14.7 cites/paper · Q1 · Springer NatureOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews13.5 cites/paper · Q1 · American Society for MicrobiologyScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39Science Advances13.2 cites/paper · Q1 · American Association for the Advancement of ScienceOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 40
“Cites/paper” is the OpenAlex 2-year citation rate — a transparent signal, not a licensed Impact Factor. Many regional and open-access journals are strong but aren’t covered by Scimago, so they show “no Scimago quartile”; that’s a coverage gap, not a quality judgement.
Tools for your next paper
Narrower fields within Biology
Open questions mined from the Biology papers in our local library.