Best journals for Biology
The top 40 of 3,405 Biology journals, ranked with primary-Biology journals first, then by Scimago quartile and OpenAlex cites/paper (2-year window), drawn from a 17,782-venue index. Predatory venues are excluded; the FAQ below gives the exact ranking rule. These are field-wide rankings — for a shortlist matched to your specific paper, paste your title and abstract into the Journal Finder (a free account starts with 25 welcome credits).
- 1Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology40.2 cites/paper · Q1 · Nature PortfolioScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 2
- 3
- 4Pharmacological Reviews25.9 cites/paper · Q1 · American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9Journal of Extracellular Vesicles18.3 cites/paper · Q1 · Taylor & FrancisOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 10Physiological Reviews18.3 cites/paper · Q1 · American Physiological SocietyScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14Nature Communications15.9 cites/paper · Q1 · Nature PortfolioOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 15
- 16
- 17Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience15.2 cites/paper · Q1 · Canadian Medical AssociationOpen AccessScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 18
- 19
- 20Nucleic Acids Research14.6 cites/paper · Q1 · Oxford University PressOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24Experimental & Molecular Medicine13.2 cites/paper · Q1 · Springer NatureOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 25
- 26Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety13.0 cites/paper · Q1 · WileyScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 27
- 28International Journal of Oncology12.6 cites/paper · Q1 · Spandidos PublishingScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36FEMS Microbiology Reviews12.1 cites/paper · Q1 · Oxford University PressOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 37
- 38Science Advances11.8 cites/paper · Q1 · American Association for the Advancement of ScienceOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 39
- 40
“Cites/paper” is the OpenAlex 2-year citation rate — a transparent signal, not a licensed Impact Factor. Many regional and open-access journals are strong but aren’t covered by Scimago, so they show “no Scimago quartile”; that’s a coverage gap, not a quality judgement.
Tools for your next paper
Narrower fields within Biology
Open questions mined from the Biology papers in our local library.