How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

education3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The study identifies a gap in understanding the impact

Research gap analysis derived from 3 education papers in our local library.

The gap

The study identifies a gap in understanding the impact of GenAI on students' learning experiences, - The study highlights the need for research on the role of individual dispositions in shaping students' perceptions of GenAI, - The study em

Evidence profile

Stated in the cells future research and cells research gap sections of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 1 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

How Does GenAI Agency Drive Academic Engagement Among Second Language Learners? An Empirical Study Based on Self-Determination Theory (2026) · Language Teaching and Educational Research · doi
Future studies can investigate the long-term effects of GenAI-enhanced learning environments on students' academic engagement. - Research can explore the impact of GenAI on different aspects of student learning, such as cognitive strategies and learning depth. - The development of GenAI-enhanced learning environments that prioritize student agency and basic psychological needs can be a direction for future research.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: future studies investigate long-term effects genai-enhanced learning environments
Exploring Student Dispositions and Experiences with Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study in Higher Education (2026) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · cited 1× · doi
The study identifies a gap in understanding the impact of GenAI on students' learning experiences, - The study highlights the need for research on the role of individual dispositions in shaping students' perceptions of GenAI, - The study emphasizes the importance of considering the cognitive, emotional, social, and ethical implications of GenAI in higher education
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: study identifies gap understanding impact genai students learning
From Classroom Design to Newsroom Practice: Designing GenAI Assessment Intervention (2026) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi
Future research should investigate the long-term effects of the intervention on student learning outcomes. - Future research should explore the applicability of the model to other disciplines and contexts. - Future research should examine the impact of GenAI on the journalism profession and the role of educators in preparing students for a rapidly changing media landscape.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research investigate long-term effects intervention student learning

Questions about this gap

The study identifies a gap in understanding the impact of GenAI on students' learning experiences, - The study highlights the need for research on the role of individual dispositio… This is supported by 3 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.