How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

education3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

Research articles on students’ perceptions of large

Research gap analysis derived from 3 education papers in our local library.

The gap

While research articles on students’ perceptions of large language models such as ChatGPT in language learning have proliferated since ChatGPT’s release, few studies have focused on these perceptions among English as a foreign language (EFL

Evidence profile

Stated in the inline gaps and abstract and cells research gap sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2025 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 39 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

The Role of ChatGPT in EFL Research-Paper Writing: BA and MA Students’ Use and Perceptions (2026) · British Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi
Future research could investigate the potential of ChatGPT across specific Page | 39 The Role of ChatGPT in EFL Research-Paper Writing: BA and MA Students’ Use and Perceptions disciplines, its impacts on learning outcomes in the long run, and whether training in explicit prompts can support students in improving organization, coherence, and the quality of their arguments.
generalstated in inline gapsevidence 5/5
Keywords: chatgpt students future investigate potential across specific page role writing perceptions disciplines impacts learning outcomes
Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language (2025) · Education Sciences · cited 39× · doi
While research articles on students’ perceptions of large language models such as ChatGPT in language learning have proliferated since ChatGPT’s release, few studies have focused on these perceptions among English as a foreign language (EFL) university students in South America or their application to academic writing in a second language (L2) for STEM classes.
generalstated in abstractevidence 5/5
Keywords: language students perceptions chatgpt articles large models learning proliferated release focused among english foreign university
Exploiting ChatGPT to Enhance English as a Foreign Language Learning Among University Students in Vietnam (2026) · Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal · doi
The study aims to address the gap in research on the effectiveness of ChatGPT in supporting EFL learning. - The research gap is identified as the need to explore the impact of ChatGPT on students' writing performance, particularly grammar, vocabulary, and coherence. - The study aims to provide insights into how ChatGPT can be effectively integrated into autonomous learning contexts.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: study aims address gap research effectiveness chatgpt supporting

Questions about this gap

While research articles on students’ perceptions of large language models such as ChatGPT in language learning have proliferated since ChatGPT’s release, few studies have focused o… This is supported by 3 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.