Neuroscience · Research topic

Open research questions in Free Will and Agency

80 gap statements mined from Free Will and Agency papers in our 4.5M-paper local library, which holds 753 papers on the topic — drawn mostly from each paper's own stated research gap, future-work, challenge and limitation notes, and its abstract. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one.

Choosing where to publish on Free Will and Agency? See the ranked Biology journals.

What the literature leaves open

  • Underdamping is a common issue, but it is often not considered in the interpretation of arterial pressure waveforms.

    Underdamping: An elephant in the room? · 2026 · DOI
  • However, how the brain integrates seemingly separate moments into a coherent whole remains poorly understood.

    Illusory-Causal Impression Attenuates the Detection of Event Boundaries · 2026 · DOI
  • The results suggest that further investigation into the ways in which internal awareness, expectations about external appearance, and free will belief relate to authenticity, may be useful in clinical practice.

    From ‘Know thyself!’ to ‘Be your true self’: free will belief as a mediator in the relationship between internal state awareness, appearance consciousness, style consciousness, and social anxiety with authenticity · 2025 · DOI
  • Whether SoA corresponds to those neural representations that implement actual neuromuscular control is an open question with ethical, medical, and legal implications.

    Overlapping Cortical Substrate of Biomechanical Control and Subjective Agency · 2025 · DOI
  • We agree that this interplay warrants further investigation to advance the pathophysiological understanding of FMD and other movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease.

    Response to: ‘Hyperbinding’ in functional movement disorders: role of supplementary motor area efferent signalling · 2024 · DOI
  • However, philosophers have reached no consensus on the nature of this problem, let alone on whether it is solvable.

    The Disappearing Agent and the Phenomenology of Agency · 2024 · DOI
  • Yet, studies investigating the sense of agency in these patients show seemingly conflicting results: some indicated under-attribution of self-agency (coherently with certain positive symptoms), while others suggested over-attribution of self-agency.

    Sense of agency in schizophrenia: A reconciliation of conflicting findings through a theory-driven literature review · 2024 · DOI
  • Further exploration of the implications of the paper's argument for our understanding of free will and moral responsibility. Engagement with other philosophical approaches to the Luck Argument. Application of the paper's approach to other contexts and debates.

    Free will, luck and control · 2026 · DOI
  • The paper identifies a gap in the restorative justice literature regarding the structural contradiction created when a restorative circle is followed by a punitive sentence. The paper argues that the community's role in transgression and the concept of punishment as a category error remain unspoken in restorative practice.

    Beyond the Circle: A Habenular Critique of Restorative Justice · 2026 · DOI
  • The paper identifies a gap in the literature on determinism and free will in the context of criminal law. It suggests that the compatibilist position has not been fully explored in this context.

    Determinizm i wolna wola w doktrynie prawa karnego – wybrane konteksty. Propozycja kompatybilistyczna · 2026 · DOI
  • The need for a bounded, auditable ethical review framework. The lack of a framework that preserves hard floors, unresolved remainder, contest, and accountable human decision.

    PEA - Primitive Ethical Axioms; P-Gates PPP Kernel · 2026 · DOI
  • The gap is the need to update our understanding of free will to better fit with our overall understanding of the world. The author identifies the need to revise our overall best account of free will to conflict with elements of widespread convictions about how we tend to think about free will.

    Précis to Revisionism in Four Views on Free Will, 2e · 2026 · DOI
  • The lack of a clear defense against skeptical arguments. The need to examine the relation between freedom and determinism. The need to address objections from various philosophers.

    Knowledge of practical freedom: a Moorean defense · 2026 · DOI
  • It argues that the W-Defense can be used to fill this gap. The paper also discusses the limitations of prior work on the topic.

    Action-omission symmetry accepted, praise-blame symmetry rejected · 2026 · DOI
  • It highlights the need for a clearer analysis of the relationship between the inability story and the strong urges story.

    Resisting inability · 2026 · DOI
  • The paper does not explicitly state the research gap it aims to address, but it seems to be related to the concept of mereological emergentism and its application to agent-causal libertarianism. It discusses the challenges faced by emergentism, including the exclusion problem and the general incoherence objection.

    Mereological emergentism and agent-causal libertarianism · 2026 · DOI
  • The ways in which we can change our practices so as to attach consequences to norm-transgressions which can both serve the needs of justice and serve the needs of care, warrants further exploration. Yet despite these considerations, threshold ages for legal culpability still vary widely across democratic states.

    Think of the children: on the responsibility of children and other evolving agents · 2026 · DOI
  • The paper identifies a gap in understanding the neurocognitive basis of intention, particularly whether it is based on predictive or postdictive processes. There is a need to investigate how intention is informed by the expectancy of action-related sensory feedback.

    Timing of the intention to act reflects action feedback expectancy · 2026 · DOI
  • The lack of a clear definition of responsibility and its relation to the special question 'Why?'. The limitations of current approaches to defining intentional action. The need for a novel theory of responsibility that overcomes the objections to the use of the special question.

    Responsibility and the Special Question ‘Why?’ · 2026 · DOI
  • The concept of intentionality is not fully understood in the context of moral agency.

    Peut-il y avoir agentivité morale sans sentience ? · 2025 · DOI
  • Testing whether parts of the boundary role can be played by other agents with sufficiently different frames.

    Another Frame Problem: The Outermost Frame and Constitutive Recording in Self-Amending LLM Systems · 2026 · DOI
  • It argues that the incompatibilist conception of two-way powers is incompatible with the causal conception of acting.

    Are Two-Way Powers Causal Powers? · 2025 · DOI
  • The challenge of determining which consequences matter in consequential decisions. The challenge of preserving hard floors, unresolved remainder, contest, and accountable human decision.

    PEA - Primitive Ethical Axioms; P-Gates PPP Kernel · 2026 · DOI
  • Further research could investigate the neural basis of intention and its relationship with action feedback expectancy, - The study could be replicated with a larger sample size and a more diverse population, - Future studies could explore the implications of the findings for our understanding of free will…

    Timing of the intention to act reflects action feedback expectancy · 2026 · DOI
  • The evidence is currently lacking for the concept of we-agency, - The specific nature of the change in the sense of agency during joint action has yet to be clarified, - The usage of other perceptual effects as markers of agency is still…

    Sense of agency in joint action: a critical review of we-agency · 2024 · DOI

Most-cited papers in Free Will and Agency

Most recent work

Find a gap in your own Free Will and Agency sub-topic

This page shows what the Free Will and Agency literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, search the Research Gap Finder: the search is free with a free account and lists the papers closest to your topic first. Unlocking that topic (50 credits, charged once) fills the comparison table from our 4.5M-paper local library and writes the gaps from its rows.

Open the Research Gap Finder →

Related topics in Neuroscience

Open questions raised by papers listed on this page include: (1) How the brain integrates seemingly separate moments into a coherent whole remains poorly understood (“Illusory-Causal Impression Attenuates the Detection of Event Boundaries”, 2026); (2) It suggests that the compatibilist position has not been fully explored in this context (“Determinizm i wolna wola w doktrynie prawa karnego – wybrane konteksty.”, 2026); (3) The lack of a framework that preserves hard floors, unresolved remainder, contest, and accountable human decision (“PEA - Primitive Ethical Axioms; P-Gates PPP Kernel”, 2026); (4) There is a need to investigate how intention is informed by the expectancy of action-related sensory feedback (“Timing of the intention to act reflects action feedback expectancy”, 2026); (5) The lack of a clear definition of responsibility and its relation to the special question 'Why?' (“Responsibility and the Special Question ‘Why?’”, 2026). 80 gap statements have been mined from Free Will and Agency papers in our 4.5M-paper local library, which holds 753 papers on the topic; the gaps come from whichever of those papers state one. They are mostly the research gaps the authors state and the papers' abstracts, plus future-work, limitations and challenges passages. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one, so you can read the original claim in context.

Tools for your next paper

How Pre-Check worksHow AI Review works

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.