Open research questions in Jury Decision Making Processes
523 gap statements mined from Jury Decision Making Processes papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 5,657 papers on the topic — drawn mostly from each paper's own stated research gap, future-work, challenge and limitation notes, and its abstract. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one.
Choosing where to publish on Jury Decision Making Processes? See the ranked Social Science journals.
What the literature leaves open
The lack of epistemic infrastructure in the criminal process. The need for more robust evaluation of reliability.
Expert Evidence in Criminal Law: Rethinking Reliability in England and Wales after the Lucy Letby Case · 2026 · DOIThere is a lack of systematic law in place in India to protect witnesses from threats of coercion, intimidation, or retributive violence. The current system has structural weaknesses.
Judicial Interpretation and Witness Protection in India: A Critical Analysis of Legislative Gaps and Constitutional Imperatives · 2026 · DOIFuture research should focus on improving the use of visum et repertum in the investigation of assault crimes. Future research should examine the effectiveness of forensic medical services in supporting the evidentiary process. Future research should analyze the impact of coordination between investigators and forensic doctors on the outcome of criminal cases.
The Role of Forensic Medicine and the Position of Visum et Repertum as Evidence in the Investigation of Persecution: A Case Study of the Kuningan Police Based on Law No. 1 of 2023 · 2026 · DOIThe study highlights the need for a scientific approach to support the evidentiary process in criminal justice. The study emphasizes the importance of coordination between investigators and forensic doctors in compiling medical reports.
The Role of Forensic Medicine and the Position of Visum et Repertum as Evidence in the Investigation of Persecution: A Case Study of the Kuningan Police Based on Law No. 1 of 2023 · 2026 · DOIThe paper suggests that further empirical research is needed to fully understand the implications of the study's findings. The study recommends that future research explore the application of cognitive linguistics to other legal concepts. The research suggests that further investigation is needed to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the semantic frames of TRIAL and MEDIATION.
The study notes that the traditional Aristotelian approach to defining concepts is limited in its ability to capture the complexity of legal categories.
This issue has not been addressed much in the literature so far, while it may be of interest due to the inconsistent way in which the legislator regulates the matter of disciplinary responsibility, and furthermore due to the specificity of this body.
The lack of an integrated epistemological framework capable of explaining the inferential transition from evidence to legal fact. The fragmentation of existing studies on proof.
The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 lacks statutory force. It is underfunded and unequally implemented across states. The new criminal codes do not create a legal right for witness protection.
Witness Protection In India: Legislative Deficit, Empirical Dimensions, Comparative Models, And The Imperative Of Parliamentary Legislation · 2026 · DOIThe lack of effective witness protection in India. The limitations of the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018. The need for dedicated Parliamentary legislation on witness protection.
Witness Protection In India: Legislative Deficit, Empirical Dimensions, Comparative Models, And The Imperative Of Parliamentary Legislation · 2026 · DOIThe paper suggests that future research should focus on addressing the challenges in justice analysis. The paper notes that the unification of justice, status, and power is a potential area for future research.
The study suggests that future research should consider the media's impact on the judiciary in broader contexts. The study highlights the importance of considering the media's impact on sentencing decisions.
Judging by the Cover: On the Relationship Between Media Coverage on Crime and Harshness in Sentencing · 2026 · DOIFuture research could explore the implementation of witness protection policies in different jurisdictions. It could examine the impact of witness obligations on the outcome of judicial proceedings.
The Obligations of a Witness in Judicial Proceedings: Criminal Liability or Legal Duty? (A Comparative Study) · 2026 · DOIThe paper identifies a need to balance the requirements of justice with the right to legal protection for witnesses. It highlights a gap in the understanding of witness obligations in Arab and Western systems.
The Obligations of a Witness in Judicial Proceedings: Criminal Liability or Legal Duty? (A Comparative Study) · 2026 · DOIThe development of fundamental tactical rules of the hearing within the framework of the judicial investigation is to become a priority task of forensic science, given that the judicial practice in this matter remains insufficiently generalized and valorized at the doctrinal level.
The paper notes that prior work has often remarked that proportionality in sentencing is an elusive idea, difficult to define and operationalise.
The need for an understanding of the judgment process in criminal trials under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The importance of judicial discretion, victim compensation, and accused rights in the judgment process.
The lack of case-level covariates in the public files. The potential for judges to face different case pools due to video dockets or multiple offices.
The Judge Lottery: Within-Office Disparities in Social Security Disability Adjudication, Fiscal Year 2025 · 2026 · DOIFuture research could examine the causes of the disparities in allowance rates among administrative law judges. The study's findings could inform efforts to improve the fairness and consistency of the Social Security disability adjudication process.
The Judge Lottery: Within-Office Disparities in Social Security Disability Adjudication, Fiscal Year 2025 · 2026 · DOIThe paper argues that the existing literature has not adequately addressed the interaction between jury size and other elements of criminal-jury design.
The paper notes that the vast majority of the phenomena discussed are universal phenomena which, in a similar historical period, can also be observed within the systems of continental Europe, but which did not lead there to such a significant dominance of consensual instruments in criminal proceedings.
Would Cain Plead Guilty to the Murder of Abel? On the Historical Transformation of the English and American Trial Model as a Source of Plea Bargaining · 2026 · DOIThe paper notes that the JEF is vulnerable to response biases in C and J.
Prior work has focused on high-profile cases and federal and appellate courts.
Judging by the Cover: On the Relationship Between Media Coverage on Crime and Harshness in Sentencing · 2026 · DOIThe distinction between dolus and the transcendent internal tendency is highlighted as an area that requires further clarification.
La tendencia interna trascendente como categoría diferenciada del dolo, por Nefijesus Cruz · 2026 · DOIFurther study on the implementation of the proposed reforms. Examination of the impact of the reforms on the admissibility of expert evidence. Investigation into the development of 'epistemic literacy' in the criminal justice system.
Expert Evidence in Criminal Law: Rethinking Reliability in England and Wales after the Lucy Letby Case · 2026 · DOI
Most-cited papers in Jury Decision Making Processes
- The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior · Journal of Retailing · 1997 · 1,013 citations
- Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning · The Yale Law Journal · 1913 · 783 citations
- Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1977 · 699 citations
- The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1989 · 692 citations
- Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art · Sociological Methods & Research · 2018 · 635 citations
- Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century · Crime and Justice · 2013 · 612 citations
- Logics in Action · Administrative Science Quarterly · 2013 · 606 citations
- What is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures · Law & Society Review · 1988 · 571 citations
- An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion · Social Problems · 1991 · 535 citations
- The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1 · Journal of Personality · 1977 · 506 citations
Most recent work
- FHESS >< FESS >< FCLS WORKING PAPER — RESEARCH NOTE 23 — OBJECTIVE STRATEGIC INTENT, ENDOLOGICAL WARFARE, CARE AND CONFIGURATIONAL READABILITY · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026
- Juror decision making: Does juror stigma, mental health literacy, or the description of a defendant's mental health status, impact decision-making in a mock criminal trial? · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · 2026
- The prosecutor's cut: Body‐worn camera evidence and criminal case dispositions · Criminology & Public Policy · 2026
- Sentence Variability in a Mathematical Sentencing Framework: A Statistical Analysis of Brazilian Court Data · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · 2026
- The Space Between Evidence and Implication · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026
- Unmet Needs? Juror Perspectives on Support Following Jury Service in England and Wales · Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma · 2026
- Laypersons’ beliefs and knowledge about human memory: do jurors require expert evidence about memory? · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · 2026
- Extralegal Factors in Evaluating Muslim Defendants: Impact of Juror’s Identity and Stereotypic Crime on Sentencing, Fairness, and Leniency · Routledge Open Research · 2026
- Expert Evidence in Criminal Law: Rethinking Reliability in England and Wales after the Lucy Letby Case · Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly · 2026
- Standard and simplified judicial instructions on alibis: the effects of confession and alibi evidence on believability · Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
Find a gap in your own Jury Decision Making Processes sub-topic
This page shows what the Jury Decision Making Processes literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, search the Research Gap Finder: the search is free with a free account and lists the papers closest to your topic first. Unlocking that topic (50 credits, charged once) fills the comparison table from our 7.9M-paper local library and writes the gaps from its rows.
Open the Research Gap Finder →