Arts and Humanities · Research topic

Open research questions in Theology and Philosophy of Evil

102 gap statements mined from Theology and Philosophy of Evil papers in our 4.5M-paper local library, which holds 1,703 papers on the topic — drawn mostly from each paper's own stated research gap, future-work, challenge and limitation notes, and its abstract. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one.

Choosing where to publish on Theology and Philosophy of Evil? See the ranked Social Science journals.

What the literature leaves open

  • The lack of a clear distinction between mere worship-worthiness and supreme or maximal worship-worthiness.

    Is God’s worship-worthiness vague? · 2026 · DOI
  • It argues that the Islamic perspective on these issues is necessary to explain the existence of the universe.

    The Rational Search for Truth Existence, Consciousness, and Divine Reality · 2026 · DOI
  • Advancements in future research are necessary to fully understand the concept of 'faith' and its relationship with 'ultimate concern'. The experience of transcendence that speaks to us in the face of the Other should be further explored.

    Faith and the Other. Revisiting the Transcendence of the Other in the Psychology of Religion · 2026 · DOI
  • Further research on James’ doctrine concerning the mysterious state of consciousness should follow the relevant perspectives and approaches of both Chinese Daoist philosophy and Daoism (see Chengbing 2022).

    Enduring Philosophical Implications of William James’ Radical Empiricism · 2026 · DOI
  • Future research could explore the implications of retrocausality for human decision-making. It could also investigate the intersection of theology and physics in understanding retrocausality.

    Retrokauzalumas kaip autentiško sprendimo priėmimo sąlyga: tarp Empirėjaus ateityje ir fizinės realybės · 2026 · DOI
  • It highlights the need to integrate theological tradition and quantum physics in understanding retrocausality.

    Retrokauzalumas kaip autentiško sprendimo priėmimo sąlyga: tarp Empirėjaus ateityje ir fizinės realybės · 2026 · DOI
  • The study highlights the need for further analysis of Schleiermacher's thought and its relevance to contemporary theological debates.

    An Ethical Founding of Christology in Liberal Theology. The Exemplary Humanity of Jesus vs. His Divinity, in the System of Fr. Schleiermacher · 2026 · DOI
  • Future research could explore the implications of the paper's findings for the development of new approaches to seeking truth. Future research could investigate the applications of the paper's conclusions in different contexts.

    The Dialogue Between Theology and Science as a Sincere Search for Truth · 2026 · DOI
  • The paper aims to address this gap by analyzing the dialogue between science and Orthodox theology.

    The Dialogue Between Theology and Science as a Sincere Search for Truth · 2026 · DOI
  • The lack of acknowledgment of a higher power or structure in modern institutions and societies. The limited understanding of the concept of 'GAY' and its implications on human behavior and societal structures.

    The Undivided God · Above · Yourself Series · 2026 · DOI
  • The paper identifies a gap in the existing literature on the Fine-Tuning Argument for God's Existence, namely the lack of a thorough defense of dispositional essentialism. The author argues that existing responses to FTA are inadequate and that a new approach is needed.

    Dispositional essentialism and the fine-tuning argument · 2026 · DOI
  • Harris’ commitment to the rule of methodological naturalism in the natural sciences, as well as his lack of evidence for the limits of using it in his hermeneutical analysis of divine action, makes his academic papers represent the main assumptions of NT.

    Second Thoughts on Naturalistic Theism and Model of Levels of Analysis: A Response to Mark Harris · 2021 · DOI
  • This article remedies this lacuna by paying close attention to an understudied aspect of the development of Hobbes's religious theory from The Elements of Law to Leviathan: his treatment of the supernatural and, particularly, of matters of faith known by supernatural revelation as opposed to natural reason.

    Hobbes on the supernatural fromThe Elements of LawtoLeviathan · 2019 · DOI
  • But given the increasing heterogeneity of contemporary society, in which the language of one particular religion or secular ideology is insufficient to shape public moral discourse, Jones’s effort to develop a basis for evaluating moral responsibility on a more neutral philosophical foundation is a welcome addition to the growing body of post-Holocaust ethics literature.

    Moral Responsibility in the Holocaust. A Study in the Ethics of Character, David H. Jones (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999), xi + 257 pp., cloth $80.00, pbk. $24.95. · 2006 · DOI
  • I also show that monistic assumptions have led to an unfortunate interpretation ofAldo Leopold’s land ethic and that a pluralist and pragmatist direction is likely to provide a more efficacious and theoretically defensible direction for further study of environmental philosophy in a more practical mode.

    Why I am Not a Nonanthropocentrist · 1995 · DOI
  • The paper suggests that future research should consider alternative perspectives in understanding human behavior. The paper highlights the importance of a more nuanced understanding of human behavior.

    Methodological Reconsiderations: The Shifting Paradigms · 1987 · DOI
  • Further study is needed to fully understand the implications of the concept of rationality as anti-entropic. Research should explore the role of cognitive work, personality, and societal development in maintaining rationality. The development of new methods for maintaining rationality is an area for future research.

    Rationality is anti-entropic · 1986 · DOI
  • The concept of rationality is often assumed to be a natural state, but this paper proposes that it is actually anti-entropic. Prior work has not fully explored the implications of this idea on various aspects of human behavior and decision-making.

    Rationality is anti-entropic · 1986 · DOI
  • Future research can explore alternative theological methods that maintain the distinction between philosophy and theology. Further analysis of Rahner's theology and its implications for theological reflection can be conducted.

    Can We Know God Directly? Rahner's Solution from Experience · 1985 · DOI
  • The gap is the limitation of Rahner's approach in maintaining the distinction between philosophy and theology. The paper identifies the need for an alternative understanding of the question of whether we can know God directly.

    Can We Know God Directly? Rahner's Solution from Experience · 1985 · DOI
  • The lack of understanding of Schwab's conception of the practical in education is a challenge.

    The Vitality of Theory in Schwab's Conception of the Practical · 1985 · DOI
  • Experiences of transcendence are beyond our grasp and cannot be produced by ourselves. Empirical investigation of experiences of transcendence has remained marginal in psychological research.

    Faith and the Other. Revisiting the Transcendence of the Other in the Psychology of Religion · 2026 · DOI
  • The author argues that the Christian faith has a significant role to play in shaping human behavior and attitudes towards life and death.

    Christian Faith and the Disposing of Human Life · 1985 · DOI
  • Further study of the implications of evolutionary ethics for our understanding of human behavior. Examination of the challenges to moral arguments presented by evolutionary thinking. Exploration of the debate over the relative plausibility of objective and subjective views of ethics.

    Biology, Ethics, and Debunking Arguments · 2021 · DOI
  • The gap between evolutionary ethics and traditional ideas of morality and human agents. The challenge to religious understandings of morality presented by evolutionary thinking.

    Biology, Ethics, and Debunking Arguments · 2021 · DOI

Most-cited papers in Theology and Philosophy of Evil

Most recent work

Find a gap in your own Theology and Philosophy of Evil sub-topic

This page shows what the Theology and Philosophy of Evil literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, search the Research Gap Finder: the search is free with a free account and lists the papers closest to your topic first. Unlocking that topic (50 credits, charged once) fills the comparison table from our 4.5M-paper local library and writes the gaps from its rows.

Open the Research Gap Finder →

Related topics in Arts and Humanities

Open questions raised by papers listed on this page include: (1) The lack of a clear distinction between mere worship-worthiness and supreme or maximal worship-worthiness (“Is God’s worship-worthiness vague?”, 2026); (2) Future research could explore the implications of retrocausality for human decision-making (“Retrokauzalumas kaip autentiško sprendimo priėmimo sąlyga: tarp Empirėjaus…”, 2026); (3) Future research could explore the implications of the paper's findings for the development of new approaches to seeking truth (“The Dialogue Between Theology and Science as a Sincere Search for Truth”, 2026); (4) The lack of acknowledgment of a higher power or structure in modern institutions and societies (“The Undivided God · Above · Yourself Series”, 2026); (5) The paper identifies a gap in the existing literature on the Fine-Tuning Argument for God's Existence, namely the lack of a thorough defense of dispositional essentialism (“Dispositional essentialism and the fine-tuning argument”, 2026). 102 gap statements have been mined from Theology and Philosophy of Evil papers in our 4.5M-paper local library, which holds 1,703 papers on the topic; the gaps come from whichever of those papers state one. They are mostly the research gaps the authors state and the papers' abstracts, plus future-work, limitations and challenges passages. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one, so you can read the original claim in context.

Tools for your next paper

How Pre-Check worksHow AI Review works

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.