Open research questions in Freedom of Expression and Defamation
46 unresolved questions extracted from the limitations and future-work sections of 959 Freedom of Expression and Defamation papers in our library. Each links back to the study that raised it.
What the literature leaves open
The lack of clear regulations and guidelines for social media platforms to follow in cases of copyright infringement. The need for a balanced approach to protect copyright holders' rights and users' interests.
The novel characteristics of XR require new approaches to content moderation. The intensified psychological and social impacts of online harms in XR pose a challenge to content moderation. The lack of clear and transparent policies for content moderation is a challenge.
The erosion of moral character in digital spaces. The need for increased awareness and understanding of ethical behavior in social media use. The challenge of promoting ethical behavior in social media use in the Indonesian context.
The intentional failure to disclose LLM use can deprive others of valuable information they need for their epistemic appraisal of another's authentic competencies. The use of LLMs can lead to negative perceptions of valued features of interpersonal communication.
The paper identifies the challenge of developing content moderation systems that are accurate and fair. It highlights the challenge of balancing the need for content moderation with the need to protect user dignity and agency.
The study identifies the challenge of differing interpretations of the laws and regulations. The study identifies the challenge of difficulties in proving digital evidence. The study identifies the challenge of limited facilities and capabilities of law enforcement officers.
The study is limited to an analysis of four Arab jurisdictions, and may not be generalizable to other regions or countries. The study does not provide an empirical analysis of the impact of these laws on online hate speech, but rather a doctrinal and textual analysis of the legislative architecture.
Legislative architecture of online hate speech offences in Arab cybercrime laws: legality and proportionality · 2026 · DOIFuture research could explore the impact of these laws on online hate speech, using empirical methods to analyze the effects of different legislative architectures. The study could be expanded to include other regions or countries, providing a more comprehensive understanding of online hate speech regulation globally.
Legislative architecture of online hate speech offences in Arab cybercrime laws: legality and proportionality · 2026 · DOIThe challenge of protecting children's rights in the context of sharenting. The challenge of balancing parents' freedom to share information online with the need to protect children's privacy. The challenge of educating parents about the potential consequences of sharenting.
Future research should explore the long-term effects of sharenting on children's mental health. Future research should analyze the effectiveness of legal measures in protecting children from the harmful effects of sharenting.
Despite this increased concern, however, legal research specific to dentistry concerning defamation is still scarce.
Defamation in Dentistry: Legal Frameworks, Professional Risks and Preventive Strategies in the Digital Era · 2026 · DOIThis approach would bring a pragmatism to R2P to counter the current criticism of the norm’s political and scholarly malaise, moving the norm away from the academic and theoretical world to give the Responsibility to Protect a relevance that critics suggest is currently lacking.
The difficulty of balancing competing interests in public employee speech cases. The lack of clear guidance from the Supreme Court on the application of the balancing test.
The first amendment and the government workplace: Has the constitution fallen down on the job? · 1983 · DOIThe study identifies a gap in the application of the First Amendment to public employee speech. The author argues that the ad hoc balancing approach leads to inconsistencies and limits free speech in public organizations.
The first amendment and the government workplace: Has the constitution fallen down on the job? · 1983 · DOIThe complexity of social media regulation. The difficulty of establishing causality between social media use and negative effects. The need for social media companies to balance user safety with free speech and expression.
The paper acknowledges that it is not only Western and mainstream platforms that are worthy of scholarly attention. The analysis is limited to two platforms, VRChat and Horizon Worlds. The paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of all social XR platforms.
The study identifies a gap in the understanding of social media ethics in the Indonesian context. The decline in online ethics in Indonesia is a pressing issue that requires attention.
The paper identifies the gap in awareness about predatory, fraudulent journals among scholars. The gap in understanding the exploitative intentions of these entities is also identified.
There is a gap in the current literature regarding the ethical implications of undisclosed LLM use. The ethical implications of undisclosed LLM use during online interpersonal communications have seen little attention.
The paper suggests that future research should focus on developing more accurate and fair content moderation systems. It highlights the need for greater transparency in content moderation policies and enforcement.
The gap in current doctrine is the lack of a framework that can allocate responsibility for deepfake-induced harm. The current civil-liability doctrine does not easily resolve deepfake-induced harm.
Deepfake-induced harm and AI accountability: a layered civil-liability framework for generative models, platforms, and digital identity · 2026 · DOIThe study identifies a gap in the legal challenges associated with establishing a clear legal standard for the concept of low-quality content in contemporary legislation. The research highlights the difficulty of distinguishing between misinformation, disinformation, and legitimate speech within digital platforms.
Future research should focus on providing a comprehensive analysis of the digital evidence. Future research should focus on providing a detailed analysis of the obstacles faced by law enforcement officers.
Are corporations ever morally obligated to engage in counterspeech-that is, in speech that aims to counter hate speech and misinformation? While existing arguments in moral and political philosophy show that individuals and states have such obligations, it is an open question whether those arguments apply to corporations as well.
Some of the reasons that necessitate the increase in predatory publishing in developing countries are; the lack of proper policies or guidance on where research articles should or should not be published, the failure to embrace open access initiatives for visibility and dissemination of research outputs so as to discourage academic malpractice and unethical behaviors, lack of funds, poor or limited information literacy among other factors.
Predatory Publishing: A Catalyst of Misinformation and Disinformation Amongst Academicians and Learners in Developing Countries · 2022 · DOI
Most-cited papers in Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Underestimating digital media harm · Nature Human Behaviour · 2020 · 134 citations
- Evaluating Internet resources: Identity, affiliation, and cognitive authority in a networked world · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · 2001 · 101 citations
- Specificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China · Journal of Communication · 2020 · 75 citations
- An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · 2021 · 39 citations
- Adventures in the metaverse · Journal of Business Strategy · 2022 · 37 citations
- An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · 2020 · 34 citations
- Firms, Breach of Norms, and Reputation Damage · Business & Society · 2017 · 33 citations
- Disappearing acts: Content moderation and emergent practices to preserve at-risk human rights–related content · New Media & Society · 2020 · 33 citations
- Against Online Public Shaming · Social Theory and Practice · 2020 · 32 citations
- Social media’s canaries: content moderators between digital labor and mediated trauma · Media Culture & Society · 2022 · 32 citations
Most recent work
- Is Undisclosed LLM Use Morally Wrong? · Philosophy & Technology · 2026
- Context is the most Important Factor: One-man Companies and Corporate Attribution in Singapore · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2026
- Defending fact-checking partnerships with platform companies: ‘We can't fight alone against disinformation’ · European Journal of Communication · 2026
- Comparative Insights on Social Media as an Atrocity Prevention Tool: Policy Implications · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · 2026
- K.G.M v. Meta et al & Corporate Liability for the Negative Effects of Social Media · University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst · 2026
- Liability of Social Media Platforms for Copyright Infringement · International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology · 2026
- Moderation lessons from Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO) Overwatch: ensuring freedom of expression in online copyright enforcement through community involvement · Interactive Entertainment Law Review · 2026
- Penal Policy on Digital Defamation: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Malaysian Law · IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) · 2026
- The Metrical Epilogue to the <i>Pastoral Care</i> , Psalm 1, and the Iconography of the Alfred Jewel · Notes and Queries · 2026
- Penggunaan Media Sosial terhadap Etika Profesi Hukum dan Integritas Praktisi Hukum · JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL · 2026
Find a gap in your own Freedom of Expression and Defamation sub-topic
This page shows what the Freedom of Expression and Defamation literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, run the guided finder — it searches the gap library on demand and checks candidates against 250M+ OpenAlex works.
Open the Research Gap Finder →