Health Professions · Research topic

Open research questions in Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

583 gap statements mined from Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 4,123 papers on the topic — drawn mostly from each paper's own stated research gap, future-work, challenge and limitation notes, and its abstract. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one.

Choosing where to publish on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare? See the ranked Medicine journals.

What the literature leaves open

  • Future research should explore the information needs and challenges of patients with symptoms who have not engaged with charities; this might involve community-based recruitment approaches, particularly for marginalized groups or survivors with lower health literacy, who may find it more difficult to access health information.

    A qualitative exploration of information access and provision for cancer survivors experiencing chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: informing a framework to guide improvements to information provision · 2026 · DOI
  • Hospitals should also assess whether patients truly understand key information, have adequate opportunities to speak, and receive responses to major concerns. Higher treatment acceptance suggests that structured communication may reduce repeated explanations and decision hesitation caused by insufficient information, risk misjudgment, or low trust.

    Optimizing physician-patient communication through an integrated perspective of prospect theory and the ultimatum game: a controlled study among patients undergoing elective surgery or invasive procedures in a Chinese tertiary hospital · 2026 · DOI
  • Future research should examine how patients’ perceptions and decision needs evolve across the HSCT decision-making trajectory and develop and evaluate decision-support interventions that better incorporate patients’ values, preferences, relational contexts, and practical circumstances.

    The perceptions of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decision-making in patients with hematologic malignancies: a qualitative systematic review · 2026 · DOI
  • Future research should consider the fact that SDM is a process, and work is needed to understand how and when to optimally measure SDM so that the impact of continued reflection and reasoning are not missed.

    Reliability Testing of the CollaboRATE and SHARED Patient-Reported Measures of Shared Decision Making within Surgical Treatment Pathways: A Mixed-Methods Study · 2026 · DOI
  • Future work should explore more comprehensive, validated trust scales that account for its multidimensional nature. Future research could address these limitations by employing more detailed measurements and methodologies to enrich our understanding of the relationship between HIB, trust, and SDM.

    The Effects of Patients’ Health Information Behaviors on Shared Decision-Making: Evaluating the Role of Patients’ Trust in Physicians · 2025 · DOI
  • Future research should consider additional qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the underlying causes and implications of the identified trends.

    A Bibliometric Review of Person-Centered Care Research 2010–2024 · 2025 · DOI
  • Based on the findings of this study, we suggest several directions for future research aimed at improving communication between nurses and surgeons. First, it is essential to examine communication perceptions across various hospital units, including outpatient departments (OPDs) and intensive care units (ICUs), to gain a comprehensive understanding of communication dynamics in different clinical settings.

    Perceptions of Nurse–Surgeon Communication in the Operating Room: A Q-Methodology Study · 2025 · DOI
  • We noticed a gap in the literature providing practical guidance and felt that nurses and PCAs would be left to develop narration skills on their own, learning by trial and error, and, in doing so, perhaps failing to meet patients’ needs, which was supported by our HCAHPS data and discussions with patients.

    Developing and Implementing a Narration of Care Framework to Teach Nurses When and How to Narrate Care · 2025 · DOI
  • Diagnostic disclosure remains understudied in head and neck oncology.

    Conspiracy of Silence in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis: A Scoping Review · 2024 · DOI
  • Health professionals recognised the challenges of transmitting the information needed to improve knowledge. Urologists had little knowledge of shared decision-making and did not apply it systematically. Time limitations and doctor-patient trust issues were common challenges.

    Perspectives of clinicians and screening candidates on shared decision-making in prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a qualitative study (PROSHADE study) · 2024 · DOI
  • The second most frequently cited barrier was insufficient understanding among the patients and their families (approximately 50%).

    Shared Decision-Making in the Choice of Renal Replacement Therapy: A Comparative Text Mining Analysis of Physicians and Nurses · 2026 · DOI
  • The term “difficult patient” is ubiquitous in nursing practice yet remains poorly defined, variably applied, and laden with stigmatizing implications.

    Beyond the “Difficult Patient”: Concept Analysis of Stigmatizing Language and Its Effects on Nurses and Patients · 2026 · DOI
  • Limited research has examined provider and staff skills and knowledge gaps, attitudinal barriers, or relevant training needs specific to caring for blind or low-vision patients.

    “The Scarlet Letter B”: A qualitative study to improve health care provider education for patients who are blind or low-vision · 2025 · DOI
  • This implies that the interventions and general results reported in the ScR are not representative of all patients with cancer in all clinical settings, which on the other hand, further clarifies the knowledge gaps in the literature pertaining to the research question.

    Uncovering Nursing Communication Strategies and Relational Styles to Foster Patient Engagement in Oncology: A Scoping Review · 2024 · DOI
  • In this sense, open questions, interview responses, and subjective appreciations are difficult to measure quantitively, hampering data extraction and statistical analysis, and introducing bias risk, which was confirmed through critical appraisal.

    Conspiracy of Silence in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis: A Scoping Review · 2024 · DOI
  • Conversations about prognosis for genetic neurodevelopmental conditions are becoming more frequent; however, there is a lack of evidence and guidance on how to approach these conversations and frame the information being provided.

    Parents’ perspectives on conversations about prognosis and an assessment of prognostic information available online: A mixed-methods study · 2024 · DOI
  • The initial exposure to negative information may adversely affect parents' psychological well-being and expectations, which future research could address.

    Parents’ perspectives on conversations about prognosis and an assessment of prognostic information available online: A mixed-methods study · 2024 · DOI
  • Secondly, it extends this limited evidence-base to explicitly consider the information needs of this group.

    A qualitative exploration of information access and provision for cancer survivors experiencing chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: informing a framework to guide improvements to information provision · 2026 · DOI
  • The evidence presented in this essay reiterates that language in desmoid care is far from trivial. It is a critical yet largely unaddressed component of the patient experience. Fully understanding the impact of diagnostic terminology requires international, mixed-methods research to quantify patient and clinician perspectives and to delineate the psychosocial consequences of specific terms.

    The liminal diagnosis: how language shapes identity and care in desmoid tumours · 2026 · DOI
  • The model was significantly associated with better risk understanding, greater trust in physicians, and higher treatment acceptance. It was also associated with a lower risk of 30-day complications after surgery or invasive procedures. These main findings remained generally stable after multivariable adjustment and sensitivity analyses.

    Optimizing physician-patient communication through an integrated perspective of prospect theory and the ultimatum game: a controlled study among patients undergoing elective surgery or invasive procedures in a Chinese tertiary hospital · 2026 · DOI
  • Importantly, organizational and planning‐related factors emerged as the most rele‐ vant barriers to SDM implementation, whereas negative attitudes toward SDM were rarely reported.

    Interprofessional Insights into Shared Decision-Making in Inpatient Mental Health Facilities for Youth in Austria—A Cross-Sectional Study · 2026 · DOI
  • Various techniques have been studied to measure patient preparedness including multimedia and video resources, and phone calls, all of which show mixed results.

    Embedding consent‑aligned patient education via electronic health record smart phrases to improve preparedness for skin cancer procedures: a quality improvement pilot · 2026 · DOI
  • Studying professional vision in clinical practice, with ward rounds as a focal case, provides a conceptual framework for understanding how physicians coordinate perception, reasoning, and communication in clinical…

    Seeing the patient: professional vision in clinical ward rounds (and beyond) · 2026 · DOI
  • Future studies should assess the implementation of standardized decision aids and decision-support interventions across the full range of aesthetic plastic surgery and their effect on patient–clinician communication, patient satisfaction and decisional regret, as well…

    Shared Decision-Making in Cosmetic Procedures and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Decision Aids, Clinical Benefits, Ethical Challenges, and Future Perspectives · 2026 · DOI
  • Principal Findings The US and Norwegian trials comparing different ways of communicating the overall and statistical uncertainty of research results to the public generated mixed results.

    Alternative Presentations of Overall and Statistical Uncertainty for Adults’ Understanding of the Results of a Randomized Trial of a Public Health Intervention: Parallel Web-Based Randomized Trials · 2025 · DOI

Most-cited papers in Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Most recent work

Find a gap in your own Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare sub-topic

This page shows what the Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, search the Research Gap Finder: the search is free with a free account and lists the papers closest to your topic first. Unlocking that topic (50 credits, charged once) fills the comparison table from our 7.9M-paper local library and writes the gaps from its rows.

Open the Research Gap Finder →

Related topics in Health Professions

Open questions raised by papers listed on this page include: (1) Future research should consider the fact that SDM is a process, and work is needed to understand how and when to optimally measure SDM so that the impact of continued reflection and reasoning are not missed (“Reliability Testing of the CollaboRATE and SHARED Patient-Reported Measures of…”, 2026); (2) Future work should explore more comprehensive, validated trust scales that account for its multidimensional nature (“The Effects of Patients’ Health Information Behaviors on Shared…”, 2025); (3) Future research should consider additional qualitative and quantitative methods to explore the underlying causes and implications of the identified trends (“A Bibliometric Review of Person-Centered Care Research 2010–2024”, 2025); (4) Diagnostic disclosure remains understudied in head and neck oncology (“Conspiracy of Silence in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis: A Scoping Review”, 2024); (5) Conversations about prognosis for genetic neurodevelopmental conditions are becoming more frequent; however, there is a lack of evidence and guidance on how to approach these conversations and frame the information being provided (“Parents’ perspectives on conversations about prognosis and an assessment of…”, 2024). 583 gap statements have been mined from Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 4,123 papers on the topic; the gaps come from whichever of those papers state one. They are mostly the research gaps the authors state and the papers' abstracts, plus future-work, limitations and challenges passages. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one, so you can read the original claim in context.

Tools for your next paper

How Pre-Check worksHow AI Review works

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.