Open research questions in Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
544 unresolved questions extracted from the limitations and future-work sections of 5,052 Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment papers in our library. Each links back to the study that raised it.
What the literature leaves open
The paper identifies the challenge of conceptual drift and moral relativism in defining and understanding moral injury. It highlights the need for a sharper philosophical definition of moral injury to assist clinicians and other professional practitioners. The paper notes the challenge of developing a definition of moral injury that can be applied across different disciplines and contexts.
The concept of moral injury remains under-theorised philosophically. Current definitions often rely on subjective intuitions of what is right. There is a lack of a commonly agreed definition of moral injury.
The gap is that the intentional standard of correctness is challenged by AI-generated synthetic images. The gap also includes the lack of a satisfactory theory of depiction in synthetic images. The paper identifies the need for a new approach to account for depiction in synthetic images.
The lack of understanding of how intentionalism can account for the motivational force of painfulness. The lack of attention to the experience-directed status of painful pains. The need for a clear explanation of how subjects can know their pains are bad.
One challenge is to develop AI systems that can provide effective and responsible moral advice, while avoiding the potential risks of blind deference to AI. Another challenge is to understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of AI-generated moral advice on human moral judgments, and to develop strategies for mitigating any negative effects. A third challenge is to address the potential concerns and limitations of the study, including the use of a limited sample size and the potential for biases in the experimental design.
The study used a simulation-based power analysis, - The study had a limited sample size of 189 participants, - The study only examined the effects of LLM-generated advice in everyday moral dilemmas
Investigating the neural mechanisms of source credibility in different contexts, - Examining the role of patient ratings and work experience in modulating brain responses to veracity cues, - Studying the effects of source credibility on health decisions and outcomes
Neurocognitive mechanisms of source credibility: how work experience and patient ratings modulate the processing of medical veracity cues · 2026 · DOIThe gap is the limited understanding of the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying source credibility in medical contexts. There is a need to investigate how doctor's credibility affects the processing of medical veracity cues.
Neurocognitive mechanisms of source credibility: how work experience and patient ratings modulate the processing of medical veracity cues · 2026 · DOIInvestigating the evolutionary advantage of anger in the context of pandemic threats, - Examining the impact of ancestral and modern threats on human emotional responses in different cultures, - Studying the adaptation of psychobehavioral circuits to pandemic threats in more detail
The study identifies a gap in the understanding of how disgust or the behavioral immune system has adapted to safeguard against pandemic risks or poisoning by modern toxic substances, - The research notes that it is unclear what qualifies as salient modern disgusting stimuli, - The study aims to address the lack of integration of the evolutionary concepts of the fear module and behavioral immune systems
The study identifies challenges in defining and measuring empathy, with multiple definitions and meanings in the literature. It highlights the limitations of self-reported assessment tools and the need for further research on their validity.
Expanding the empirical study of virtual reality beyond empathy to compassion, moral reasoning, and moral foundations · 2024 · DOISmall sample size, - Limited to student participants from a university in the United States, - The study is comprised of two pre-post experiments, - The study does not compare the direct level of effects between the VR experiences, - The study requires a larger sample size to increase the statistical power necessary to hypothesize and test for possible significant differences in effect
Expanding the empirical study of virtual reality beyond empathy to compassion, moral reasoning, and moral foundations · 2024 · DOIWhile prior research has linked personality traits to unethical behavior, little is known about how different combinations of personality traits shape students' misuse of GAI.
A configurational exploration of how personality traits influence GAI academic misconduct behaviors using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis · 2026 · DOIAlthough extensive research has examined immoral behavior, little is known about how the role of episodic simulation plays on immoral behavior.
While previous research has examined individual, economic, social and political factors, the impact of religious beliefs, particularly Buddhism, remains underexplored.
Does Buddhist belief matter to pesticide application? Evidence from rice farmers in southern China · 2025 · DOIPotential reasons for our inconsistent results with those of previous studies and the implications of our current findings were discussed.
No evidence for the influence of head-heart conceptual metaphor on moral decision making and personality · 2024 · DOILimited knowledge exists regarding the factors influencing the perceptions of individuals who may have transmitted a contagious virus.
“It’s Your Fault!”—Said the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated. The Effect of COVID-19 Vaccination on Responsibility Attribution · 2024 · DOIHowever, literature on how moral decisions are made under time pressure reports conflicting results.
Pulling the lever in a hurry: the influence of impulsivity and sensitivity to reward on moral decision-making under time pressure · 2024 · DOIThis finding is consistent with the observance of a "second-order" cognitive effect as the impact of the persuasive communication is not limited to the attributes disclaimed in the message, a tribute to the robustness of the appeal.
Two-Sided versus One-Sided Appeals: A Cognitive Perspective on Argumentation, Source Derogation, and the Effect of Disconfirming Trial on Belief Change · 1987 · DOIFirst, they may be limited to the particular messages used in this study and it is possible that similar results would not be obtained with different messages. Thus, there is some evidence that these results are not limited to the particular messages used in this study.
Future research should explore the impact of other ecological factors on environmental sustainability practices. Future research should examine the role of pathogen stress in other contexts, such as individual-level decision-making. Future research should develop and test interventions to promote environmental sustainability practices in areas with high pathogen stress.
Pathogen Stress Theory in Business Ethics: Bio-ecological Influences on Firms’ Environmental Sustainability Practices · 2026 · DOIThe role of ecological factors, such as disease prevalence and climate patterns, remains largely unexplored in the context of environmental sustainability practices. Prior research has concentrated on the influence of socioeconomic, cultural, and institutional factors on environmental sustainability practices.
Pathogen Stress Theory in Business Ethics: Bio-ecological Influences on Firms’ Environmental Sustainability Practices · 2026 · DOIThe sample size was limited to 40 participants in the pilot study and 150 participants in the main experiment. The experiment only examined the impact of time pressure and self-relevance on moral decision-making in a laboratory setting.
The existing research has not fully explored the impact of time pressure on moral decision-making. The study aims to address the gap in the literature by examining the joint effects of time pressure and self-relevance on moral decision-making.
Future research should examine the neural mechanisms underlying the relationship between mental imagery perspective and moral evaluation. The study suggests that considering multiple perspectives can influence moral decision-making, and this could be explored in future research.
Most-cited papers in Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It · Annual Review of Psychology · 2011 · 13,741 citations
- The weirdest people in the world? · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 2010 · 9,804 citations
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. · Psychological Review · 2001 · 5,459 citations
- A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1990 · 4,693 citations
- Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. · American Psychologist · 1999 · 4,082 citations
- A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · 1955 · 3,416 citations
- Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers · Journal of Social Issues · 2000 · 3,328 citations
- Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2009 · 3,327 citations
- Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis · Cognitive Therapy and Research · 2003 · 3,156 citations
- An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment · Science · 2001 · 3,084 citations
Most recent work
- Absolute moral perceptions of the self and others: People are bad, a person is good, I am great. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2026
- People defer to AI moral advice, but not blindly · Cognition · 2026
- Liberals and Conservatives See Different Victims: Moral Disagreement Is Explained by Different Assumptions of Vulnerability · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 2026
- Do we say what we do? Testing cheap talk to reduce hypothetical bias in moral choice experiments · Social Science & Medicine · 2026
- Training and oversight of algorithms in social decision-making: Algorithms with prescribed selfish defaults breed selfish decisions · Computers in Human Behavior · 2026
- Detection and spill-over effects of AI-generated images in political messages: Evidence from two pre-registered experiments · Computers in Human Behavior · 2026
- Not warm or cold, but appropriate: How outcome severity shifts moral-mind inferences and trust in AI chatbots · Computers in Human Behavior · 2026
- Defining Moral Injury: A Natural Scaffold · Journal of Religion and Health · 2026
- Counterfactual harm: a counter-argument · American Journal of Epidemiology · 2026
- Can reasonable people disagree about right and wrong? The determinants and implications of perceiving moral reasonableness · Cognition · 2026
Find a gap in your own Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment sub-topic
This page shows what the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, run the guided finder — it searches the gap library on demand and checks candidates against 250M+ OpenAlex works.
Open the Research Gap Finder →