Open research questions in Big Data and Business Intelligence

What the literature leaves open

• Fourth, the AI ethics dimension—including algorithmic bias in sustainability targeting, data privacy in green consumer profiling, and accountability in automated compliance monitoring—is a critical but underexplored frontier warranting dedicated research streams.

  Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Marketing Research (2020–2025): A Bibliometric Analysis of Thematic Evolution and Authenticity Discourse · 2026 · DOI

• While existing literature highlights the general value of Big Data Analytics Capabilities (BDAC) in developed markets, few studies have contextualized this relationship for agro-industry in the North Africa region, where structural transformations are rapidly reshaping competitive dynamics.

  Big data analytics-driven agribusiness: assessing the impact on the competitiveness of Moroccan private companies through dynamic capabilities · 2026 · DOI

• There is limited research that explores the entire journey from interaction in the field to AI-product roadmap decisions to market execution. 216 World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2026, 20(01), 208–218 There are ongoing gaps, such as limited longitudinal evidence, limited evidence on measuring feedback bias, limited AI- product specificity, and underdeveloped methods to link field evidence to product-strategy outcomes.

  From voice-of-field to product strategy: Operationalizing sales feedback loops in AI product go-to-market systems · 2026 · DOI

• Sales feedback loops should be considered as a product strategy system and not just as CRM adoption, sales enablement or analytics implementation. One key element is longitudinal research that follows field signals from capture and roadmap consideration through product decisions, market relaunch, and actual commercial outcomes. Existing research often involves measuring adoption, performance, or capability at a single time point, which limits understanding of feedback-loop latency and evidence decay, as well as delayed product impact [19, 21]. The second priority is related to feedback quality. Research should come up with standardized coding schemas for voice-of-field evidence for AI products, such as concerns about model performance, explainability objections, integration barrier, data-readiness gaps, security-review objections, price-value mismatch, workflow disruption, and buyer education deficit. The resulting taxonomies would make it possible to support comparisons across companies and minimize the tendency to lump different go-to-market issues together as feature requests. This direction should incorporate CRM data, transcript analysis, win-loss, pilot notes, and product-management decisions, and maintain account and segment context. A third priority is to operationalize the measurement of bias rather than merely noting its presence. Future studies should examine how compensation structures, account size, sales stage, customer power, and salesperson expertise affect whether a field signal is captured, coded, escalated, and considered during product deliberation. This would shift the research agenda from a general recognition of sales-feedback bias to testable indicators of signal distortion across the feedback loop. Because big-data and analytics research have already shown that data abundance can create false confidence [8, 10], AI product feedback research should evaluate signals using more than frequency alone, incorporating recurrence, segment fit, revenue exposure, feasibility, and strategic alignment. A fourth priority concerns governance design. Product councils, revenue-operations review boards, customer advisory boards and AI-assisted evidence triage mechanisms should be compared. The most helpful studies would measure the effectiveness of governance structures in improving the accuracy of the roadmap, quality of prioritization, efficiency of the sales cycle, success of the implementation, or retention. The concept of servitization and co-creation research in digital also indicates that incremental customer-driven learning can enhance innovation processes [17] but, in an AI go- to-market context there is a need to pay attention to the management of model risk, trust, regulatory exposure, and implementation capability. Finally, interdisciplinary work should integrate sales management, product innovation, information systems, data science, and organizational learning. AI product feedback loops are not limited to commercial systems. They are decision systems that shape how market evidence disciplines product ambition. Studies that assess end-to-end loop integrity from data capture and interpretation through governance accountability, roadmap action, and enablement feedback will make the strongest future contributions.

  From voice-of-field to product strategy: Operationalizing sales feedback loops in AI product go-to-market systems · 2026 · DOI

• With tremendous progress made, a few areas that could be developed in greater detail in the future as enterprise big data platforms evolve remain. The first one is understandable and reliable AI. With the growing sophistication of deep learning models used in organizations to inform decisions with high stakes, the need for outputs that are interpretable and can be audited by stakeholders will only grow even stronger. Future research directions should include the ability to incorporate explainability directly within enterprise pipelines (as opposed to it being an addon) and setting standards for the quality of explainability in a business context. Another trend is privacy-enhancing, security-focused analytics. With growing regulatory attention and public awareness of data privacy, methods that are helpful in the area of federated such as data protection, learning, secure multi-party and differential computation, are becoming more relevant in this context, since enterprises must make good use of the benefits of data for sensitive data without risking compromising the data itself. Research that is able to strike a balance between privacy guarantees, scalability, and speed of enterprise operations would be of great value. Third, an improvement is needed in data governance and automation of data quality in the field. Waste due to poor data quality is a significant factor in failed programs, and future platforms must feature some sort of intelligent and automated governance element to continuously monitor, clean and document the data as it flows throughout the system. Equally important and relevant is addressing principles of ethical use of AI – fairness, accountability, and bias mitigation. Lastly, real-time and edge intelligence appear to be a promising new area. With data now coming from many distributed sensors and devices, bringing the analytical power to the data can minimize latency and help provide timely, more informed decision-making. Linking that real-time stream processing with models continually learn from new results might lead to platforms that respond to events and are even anticipating them. Together, these routes point to a new generation of trustworthy, privacy mindful, selfgoverning, and more autonomous systems, as opposed to platforms that simply process data.

  AI-Driven Insights Through Enterprise Big Data Platforms · 2026 · DOI

• Future research could focus on hybrid DEA–XAI frameworks enabling explainable benchmarking of production units or robotic systems, thereby enhancing human trust in AI–supported per- formance assessment. However, operational and infrastruc- ture management issues (allocation, routing, maintenance, energy efficiency) remain underexplored.

  Data Envelopment Analysis and Technologies of the Industry of the Future: A Scoping Review · 2026 · DOI

• Given the ethical and governance challenges identified, future research should explore ethics-by-design approaches that embed fairness, transparency, and accountability into GenAI systems (Floridi et al. Future research could investigate how organizations cultivate AI literacy and support continuous learning to maintain employability and creativity (Davenport & Kirby, 2016; McKinsey Global Institute, 2023). Further work is needed to understand how GenAI transforms skill requirements, work design, and patterns of human–AI collaboration. Cross-sector and international collaborations could be examined as mechanisms for ensuring inclusive AI-driven growth. the findings of this review, several research trajectories warrant further exploration.

  Generative Artificial Intelligence as an Enabler of Organizational Ambidexterity in the Knowledge Economy · 2026 · DOI

• This systematic review has provided an overview of technical barriers that stall smart service adoption in OEMs. Eight barrier categories were identified and synthesized across 20 primary studies, then mapped onto a smart-service architecture and core analytics roles. This mapping highlights that barriers concentrate in the mid to top-stack layers of data management, semantics and integration, and that data- engineering-centric work carries a disproportionate share of the burden, while governance and modularity issues propagate across all layers and stakeholders. Building on these findings, we discussed how emerging GenAI approaches can aid in data preparation, semantic enrichment, integration and analytics design. Modular knowledge graphs, combined with GenAI building blocks (e.g., LLM agents, RAG, and embeddings), can help structure heterogeneous lifecycle knowledge and enable more capable and explainable analytics. Future work could pursue two complementary directions. First, the review could be extended by broadening the literature base (e.g., additional databases and grey literature), by validating/refining the barrier categories through empirical studies, as well as interviews with OEMs to strengthen the evidence for the research agenda. Additionally, a systematic literature review of GenAI-based improvements could further structure solution patterns. Second, researchers and practitioners should design and evaluate modular frameworks that integrate knowledge-graphs, embedding layers and GenAI components with non-GenAI improvements in infrastructure, processes, and governance to test their improvement in task- specific metrics as well as the reduction of development time.

  Still no smart service? A review of technical barriers to smart service adoption in the GenAI era · 2026 · DOI

• systems, predictive search infrastructures, social-engagement algorithms, and marketplace-ranking architectures rather than direct customer navigation alone. Businesses therefore require strategic systems capable of optimizing not only product quality and branding, but also engagement metrics, behavioral interaction patterns, fulfillment performance, and algorithmic responsiveness simultaneously. www.ijrp.org Rifat Can Ishakoglu / International Journal of Research Publications (IJRP.ORG) 1521 Commercial growth increasingly depends on understanding how intelligent ecosystems allocate attention and prioritize exposure across digital environments. The second major component involves predictive behavioral intelligence. Traditional customer-analysis systems often focused on historical purchasing activity and broad demographic segmentation. AI-dominated commerce environments increasingly reward organizations capable of interpreting evolving behavioral micro-signals such as engagement timing, browsing patterns, emotional responsiveness, conversion probability, and purchasing intent before transactions occur. Strategic business development therefore increasingly depends on building infrastructures capable of integrating predictive consumer analytics into product positioning, content generation, pricing systems, and customer-retention strategy continuously rather than relying solely on retrospective market analysis. Operational intelligence forms another essential element of sustainable AI-centric growth architecture.

  Algorithm-Centric Business Development: Redefining Growth Strategies in AI-Dominated E-Commerce Ecosystems · 2026 · DOI

• algorithms, ranking systems, platform governance policies, or advertising-distribution structures controlled externally. This form of dependency creates strategic fragility because organizational scalability increasingly relies on maintaining favorable algorithmic positioning within ecosystems governed by third-party AI systems. Algorithmic opacity intensifies these vulnerabilities further. www.ijrp.org Rifat Can Ishakoglu / International Journal of Research Publications (IJRP.ORG) 1512 Most AI-driven platforms do not disclose the full operational logic behind recommendation systems, search prioritization models, advertising optimization engines, or behavioral-ranking structures. Businesses therefore attempt to optimize for visibility and engagement within partially invisible systems whose evaluation criteria may evolve continuously without transparency. Commercial growth increasingly becomes dependent on interpreting indirect algorithmic signals rather than operating inside fully observable market environments. This changes the nature of strategic planning fundamentally because organizations must continuously adapt to shifting platform logic without possessing complete informational visibility. Data ownership itself has become increasingly complex within digital commerce ecosystems. Many businesses generate valuable customer interaction data through marketplace activity, social engagement, advertising systems, and platform-mediated transactions. However, substantial portions of that behavioral intelligence remain controlled by the platforms facilitating the interactions rather than by the businesses generating the commercial activity. This creates strategic limitations because companies may scale successfully inside platform ecosystems while simultaneously failing to develop independent predictive intelligence capability. As a result, organizations increasingly face a long-term strategic dilemma: achieving rapid growth through platform integration while risking excessive dependence on external data infrastructures over time. Consumer privacy concerns further complicate these governance dynamics. AI-driven commerce ecosystems increasingly rely on highly granular behavioral monitoring involving browsing patterns, engagement timing, purchasing behavior, location signals, device interaction, and predictive consumer profiling. While such systems improve personalization and commercial efficiency, they also generate growing public concern regarding surveillance-based commerce models and algorithmic manipulation. Consumers increasingly question how behavioral information is collected, interpreted, shared, and monetized across digital ecosystems.

  Algorithm-Centric Business Development: Redefining Growth Strategies in AI-Dominated E-Commerce Ecosystems · 2026 · DOI

• In the context of international expansion, digitalisation and automation of production processes are vital for the efficiency and adaptability of companies, and the example provided by D.C. demonstrates the need for commitment in this regard: “We have robots working alongside our employees to produce a new model and manufacture parts every 90 seconds, in three shifts.” This need is also reflected in the 2030 strategy of the company represented by P.Z., except that in their case, the robots have the ability to deliver customised products for each customer segment. For his part, L.D. emphasised the importance of digital support, particularly through cloud solutions that enable real-time documentation and operations management and allow teams in different corners of the world to remain productive. L.D. mentions that “they have been vital to the company’s development, given that we are talking about fintech. Technology and innovation are, par excellence, the company's core objectives [...] To a large extent, given that our product is 100% digital. Any new technology – whether we are talking about machine learning, artificial intelligence, or other innovations – is quickly adapted and integrated into our operations or products.” When it comes to the most effective technological tools used to manage international operations, most of the respondents concluded that the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) are two key technologies that are transforming the way companies operate globally. Through these technologies, companies can accelerate internal processes, improve customer experience, and increase performance in foreign markets. In this context, a concrete example of using IoT to improve performance for products listed on global markets is the integration of connected vehicles, which use IoT technology to provide a safer and more personalised driving experience. Respondent D.C. points out: “The company has also invested significantly in the development of interconnected cars that use Internet of Things (IoT) technology to improve the experience. These include advanced infotainment systems, assistance services, and other features that turn them into connected devices.” Autonomous technologies based on artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to optimise international operations and radically transform businesses globally. They can facilitate rapid expansion into various markets because they have the ability to adapt to diverse conditions, making them an ideal solution for large-scale implementation. D.C.

  Integrating Digitalisation into SMEs Internationalisation Strategies. A Qualitative Analysis · 2026 · DOI

• on consequential business decisions. This set of questions suggests that the real time decision intelligence relies on plausible, interpretable and controllable analytics as opposed to speed. Another line of literature is a connection between analytical competitive innovation capability adaptation. Studies on analytics capability and innovation that dynamic capabilities interpose the connection between big-data capability that and organizational results, which showed technology produces value via complementary organizational mechanisms as opposed to a direct mechanical communication. This thought has a lot of relevance with this topic. Real-time insight platforms are not automatic in enhancing the quality of the decisions. Value is determined by the way data products, the model output, alerts and explanations are integrated into work processes, the escalation path, and the strategic routines. Throughout the literature, one can see a particular trend: to be able to move beyond dashboards successfully, one would have to switch to more integrated platforms in which data operations, the methods of data analysis, and decision making processes go hand in hand. Table 1 summarizes representative studies from References the heterogeneity of the evidence base and explains how research has been made in the fields of architecture, decision support, data quality, governance and in a particular adaptive intelligence and not table points out. The through implied and International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH) 1746 International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH) e ISSN: 2584-2137 Vol. 04 Issue: 04 April 2026 Page No: 1744-1755 https://irjaeh.com https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEH.2026.0228 theoretical tradition.

  Beyond Dashboards: Designing AI-Powered Data Platforms for Real-Time Business Insights and Decision Intelligence · 2026 · DOI

• One important future direction is the development of cross-layer assessment frameworks. Recent research frequently decouples platform performance, accuracy of the analytics or organization adoption. The interrelationships in a single evaluative framework would be more informative designs, bridging ingestion latency, semantic integrity, model drift, recommendation acceptance and business outcome measures. This work can give an understanding of the technical design alternatives that the most significant influence on the organization forms that may promote or deter platform value. The second trend is in regard to adaptive semantics and model governance. The real time environments breed perpetual change in the definition of the data, the process structure, customer behaviour and operational limitations. The future platforms should possess a more profound semantic monitoring, automatic lineage validation and drift conscious model management which can transcend the into business-rule evolution. Advances in this direction would lessen the mismatch that would arise between current looking interfaces and old interpretive logic. A third direction concerns human-AI collaboration. It is already mentioned in the literature that a dashboard in itself is inadequate, and a black-box automation may be a problem. Future research should therefore be on the role played by explanations, the measures of confidence, logic of escalation and interaction design in affecting quality of judgment in time pressure situations. The degree of automation might be needed in different contexts of decision making and more specific design advice is needed in areas of risk, regulation or reputational risk. Fourth direction is in regard to architectural convergence. Platform designs are not commonly studied in conjunction with streaming systems, Lakehouse environments, and digital twins, as well as explainable AI. statistical monitoring is no longer leaning towards is beneath Integrative architectures would be beneficial in future scholarship in relating these components and putting them through a realistic organizational environment. This work could help establish decision-intelligence platform design as a coherent discipline, rather than a collection of promising but disconnected technical contributions.

  Beyond Dashboards: Designing AI-Powered Data Platforms for Real-Time Business Insights and Decision Intelligence · 2026 · DOI

• Second, it is restricted to listed firms in China and, therefore, might not be generalizable to the context of a private firm or state-owned enterprises. This study has focused on the effect of data-based management on the consistency of decisions in Chinese companies, and it has filled a significant gap in the knowledge the systematic use of data affects regarding how that companies with high organizational decisions.

  The Impact of Data-Driven Management on Decision Consistency in Firms: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing and Service Sectors · 2026 · DOI

• Network analyses demonstrate that while operational technology adoption dominates the current discourse, theoretical integration with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) paradigms remains fundamentally underexplored.

  A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE IN CORPORATE MANAGEMENT · 2026 · DOI

• To address the gaps identified in this study, the following strategic recommendations are proposed for industry stakeholders: For Corporate Brands: Enterprises must stop purchasing isolated AI applications and prioritize building a unified first-party Customer Data Platform (CDP) to clean and prepare data pipelines for machine learning models, while setting up strict governance guidelines to screen AI content for accuracy. For Marketing Agencies: Creative firms must transition from legacy time-based or volume-based billing structures to value-based or performance-linked pricing to capture revenue from AI efficiencies, while establishing internal competency teams focused on prompt engineering and platform management. For Academic Curriculums: Undergraduate and postgraduate management programs (BBA/MBA) must update marketing syllabi to replace legacy manual keyword targeting modules with mandatory coursework in data science analytics, voice search optimization, and AI tool operations. 8. CONCLUSION This study confirms that Artificial Intelligence has transitioned from an optional software tool into a fundamental core infrastructure that dictates competitive advantage in the modern digital marketing landscape. The empirical evidence demonstrates that while AI acts as a powerful efficiency multiplier for workflow automation and programmatic ad optimization, it lacks independent creative autonomy and faces significant barriers regarding talent deficits, data fragmentation, and high software costs. Ultimately, the long-term scope of marketing automation relies on a collaborative human-AI ecosystem; the businesses that succeed will be those that restructure their first-party data assets, update corporate business models, and invest heavily in upskilling their workforce to manage autonomous, multi-modal AI frameworks safely and strategically. REFERENCES Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard Business Press. Chintagunta, P., Naik, P. A., & Kalyanaram, G. (2016). Structural models of marketing. Marketing Science, 35(5), 693-706. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Gartner Research. (2025). Top Strategic Technology Trends in Digital Marketing Automation. Gartner IT Symposium. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2021). Marketing Management (16th ed.). Pearson Education. McKinsey & Company. (2024). The State of AI in Creative Agency Operations and Media Buying. McKinsey Global Institute. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. © Author(s).

  A Study on the Future Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Marketing · 2026 · DOI

• Future research should examine how specifi c processes are instrumented, how employees interpret analytics, how models are integrated into workfl ow systems and how feedback loops are maintained. Future research should examine the conditions under which big data transformation creates operational fragility rather than resilience.

  From Data Possession to Operations Reconfiguration: Transforming Firm Operations under Big Data - An Integrative Literature Review · 2026 · DOI

• Future research directions should focus on expanding the dynamic and predictive capabilities of visual dashboards. • One promising avenue of future work involves integrating swarm intelligence algorithms, such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), to enhance the spatial data analysis and dynamic routing of supply chain information directly within the BI interface (Chaturvedi et al., 2014). • Another critical area for future exploration is the enhancement of natural language processing modules to effectively support complex, multilingual business that global collaborative teams can interact seamlessly with the same centralized dashboard architecture (Caglayan et al., 2024).

  The Impact of Power BI-Based Dashboards on Managerial Decision-Making · 2026 · DOI

• Key open questions include how closely lighter models trained on UXPID can replicate the original LLM annotations, and whether models transfer to other technical domains such as consumer electronics or enterprise software without domain-specific fine-tuning.

  User eXperience Perception Insights Dataset (UXPID): Synthetic User Feedback from Public Industrial Forums · 2026 · DOI

• This paper has several limitations that constrain the confidence with which its conclusions should be held. The most significant limitation is the absence of controlled empirical evidence for the central causal claim. The paper establishes a correlation: failure rates are high; failure modes are predominantly non-technical; current CAIO hiring prioritises technical credentials. From this correlation it infers that the hiring mismatch is a contributor to the failure rate. This inference is plausible and consistent with the evidence but is not definitively established. A properly designed study would follow a cohort of CAIO appointments over time, measure both credential profile and adoption outcomes, and control for organisational confounders such as sector, company size, AI investment level, and board sophistication. No such study currently exists in the published literature to the author's knowledge. This is itself a research gap worth naming explicitly. Page 22 · Not peer-reviewed · © 2026 MustafarAI · CC BY 4.0 Mohd Fadzil · The CAIO Competency Problem · WP-2026-07 · Preprint, April 2026 Second, the paper's argument applies most cleanly to large, non-technology-native enterprises — banks, healthcare providers, government agencies, manufacturing groups — where the commercial and organisational complexity of AI adoption is high relative to the internal technical capability. For technology-native organisations, AI-focused startups, or research-intensive industries, the relative weight of technical versus commercial competency is different, and the hiring logic that currently dominates may be more appropriate. The paper does not claim universal application. Third, the analysis of CAIO hiring draws primarily on FTSE 100 and US enterprise data, which reflects the available published research. APAC hiring patterns are less well documented, and the argument made in Section 9 about APAC-specific dynamics relies more heavily on the author's direct observation than on published research. More systematic documentation of CAIO hiring practices in Southeast Asia, East Asia, and South Asia would strengthen or complicate the APAC-specific claims. Fourth, and most importantly, the author's background — as an independent AI inventor and commercial practitioner who is explicitly positioning for the kind of CAIO role this paper argues for — creates an obvious conflict of interest that has been disclosed but cannot be fully corrected for. The argument should be assessed on its evidence and logic. Readers should nonetheless weigh the conflict. Future research that would most usefully extend or challenge the argument includes: longitudinal studies of CAIO appointment outcomes stratified by credential background; comparative analysis of AI adoption outcomes in organisations that have applied competency- led versus credential-led CAIO hiring; qualitative case studies of AI adoption successes and failures that document the role of CAIO competency profile in each outcome; and systematic content analysis of CAIO job postings over time to track whether the stated requirements are shifting toward the competency profile the evidence supports.

  The CAIO Competency Problem: Why Enterprise AI Fails and What the Right Leadership Profile Actually Requires · 2026 · DOI

• Future research could address these limitations and further enrich the understanding of big data analytics in B2B contexts. Cross-cultural comparative studies would be valuable in identifying how regional and institutional factors influence analytics adoption and its impact on performance. Longitudinal research designs could examine the tem- poral progression of analytics maturity and its sustained influence on strategic outcomes. Moreover, future investigations could focus on industry-specific analyses to determine whether the mechanisms link- ing big data analytics, customer satisfaction, and firm performance differ across sectors such as healthcare, education, or logistics. Firm size also influences these relationships, as previous studies suggest that the development and implementation of big data strategies vary by organizational scale and resource availability (Badghish and Soomro, 2024; Mikalef et al., 2019). Another promising avenue involves explor- ing the integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and predictive analytics to assess how emerging technologies enhance or transform the value derived from big data. Finally, incorporating human and organizational dimensions such as leadership support, data literacy, employee attitudes, and change management, these variables could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the social and cultural foundations that enable data-driven success in B2B organizations.

  Linking customer big data analytics to firm performance: evidence from B2B organizations in an emerging market context · 2026 · DOI

• 7.1 Summary We have designed, implemented, and evaluated an end- to- end data engineering pipeline for e- commerce analytics. The system ingests raw CSV data, performs ETL using Python, loads data into PostgreSQL, and constructs a star schema that enables fast, intuitive analytical queries. Performance metrics confirm high data accuracy, completeness, and consistency. The project demonstrates practical skills in data ingestion, transformation, dimensional modeling, and database management—core competencies for modern data engineering roles. 7.2 Future Enhancements  Workflow orchestration: Integrate Apache Airflow for scheduled, dependency- aware pipeline runs.  Real- time streaming: Replace batch ingestion with Kafka + Spark Streaming for near- real- time analytics.  Cloud deployment: Deploy the pipeline on AWS (S3 for storage, Redshift for warehousing, Lambda for serverless ETL).  Interactive dashboards: Connect to Power BI or Tableau for dynamic reporting.  Data quality framework: Add Great Expectations for automated data validation. 7.3 Final Conclusion This paper provides a reproducible, well- documented example of an e- commerce data pipeline that bridges the gap between academic learning and industry practice. The source code and configuration are available from the authors upon request.

  An End-to-End Data Engineering Pipeline for E- Commerce Analytics:Design, Implementation, and Performance Evaluation · 2026 · DOI

• Manufacturing and logistics sectors show only moderate AI adoption (54%) compared to finance (79%) and technology (74%), yet the paper does not investigate sector-specific barriers to AI integration in strategic decision-making or whether domain constraints (supply chain complexity, real-time operational requirements) explain slower adoption and lower decision efficiency gains.

  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Decision-Making in Global Business Management · 2026 · DOI

• The study documents that companies with formal AI ethics policies achieve 25% higher stakeholder trust, but lacks granular data on which specific governance frameworks (e.g., algorithmic audit procedures, bias detection protocols, transparency standards) most effectively improve ethical compliance ratings from 55/100 to 72/100.

  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Decision-Making in Global Business Management · 2026 · DOI

• Regional analysis reveals disparate AI adoption rates (78% North America vs. 47% Middle East & Africa) with different primary challenges, yet no framework exists to predict how emerging economies can leapfrog integration complexity barriers or how technology transfer mechanisms could accelerate strategic AI capability maturation in lower-adoption regions.

  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Decision-Making in Global Business Management · 2026 · DOI

Most-cited papers in Big Data and Business Intelligence

• Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰ · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2020 · 840 citations
• Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2020 · 720 citations
• The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2021 · 599 citations
• Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation · Journal of Business Research · 2020 · 560 citations
• How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops · Journal of Business Research · 2021 · 470 citations
• Big data analytics capability and decision-making: The role of data-driven insight on circular economy performance · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2021 · 468 citations
• Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda · Journal of Business Research · 2020 · 449 citations
• The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT · Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review · 2023 · 441 citations
• Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance · Journal of Business Research · 2022 · 435 citations
• AI-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework · Journal of Business Research · 2022 · 416 citations

Most recent work

• AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Supply Chain Resilience, Financial Risk Management, and Digital Marketing Strategy: A Unified Business Intelligence Framework · Journal of Business and Management Studies · 2026
• AI-driven business model innovation in service industries: a systematic review · Service Industries Journal · 2026
• SAP SAP C_THR92_2105 PDF · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026
• From AI Hype to Workflow Reality: A Strategic Framework for Integrating Generative AI Across Organizational Functions · Organizational Dynamics · 2026
• Big Data Analytics Applications And Opportunities With AI · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · 2026
• AI-Augmented Strategic Decision-Making Under Time Constraints: An Experimental Study on Mental Representations and Strategic Foresight · Strategy Science · 2026
• A Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Decision-Making in Indian Businesses · International Journal of Emerging Research in Science Engineering and Management · 2026
• The Role of Strategic Planning in Enhancing Cloud-Based Business Intelligence to Achieve Organizational Goals in Jordanian Commercial Banks · International Review of Management and Marketing · 2026
• The Moderating Role of Business Intelligence in the Relationship between Supply Chain Alliances and Sustainable Firm Performance within Emerging Economic Environment · International Review of Management and Marketing · 2026
• Artificial intelligence-enabled strategic management: A review of its impact on decision-making effectiveness and organizational performance · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026

Related topics in Business, Management and Accounting