Environmental Science · Research topic

Open research questions in Flood Risk Assessment and Management

941 gap statements mined from Flood Risk Assessment and Management papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 5,073 papers on the topic — drawn mostly from each paper's own stated research gap, future-work, challenge and limitation notes, and its abstract. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one.

Choosing where to publish on Flood Risk Assessment and Management? See the ranked Earth Science journals.

What the literature leaves open

  • The research highlights the need for non-structural measures that can effectively reduce flood risk in urban and peri-urban areas. The study faces challenges related to hydrological variability and uncertainty in water availability.

    Application of retention basins and on-contour swales for flood risk reduction · 2026 · DOI
  • Existing research often focuses solely on environmental factors, ignoring socioeconomic considerations. There is a need for a more comprehensive approach to flood risk management, considering multiple criteria. The paper identifies a gap in the development of frameworks that integrate multi-criteria models with geospatial regression.

    Integrating multi-criteria models into geospatial regression to explore spatially varying flood risk · 2026 · DOI
  • Explaining the uncertainty inherent in the approach that has been designed.

    Morecambe Area Gaming Environment (MAGE): An Applied Case Study for Coastal Futures and Adaptations · 2026 · DOI
  • The need for a system that can facilitate community engagement and decision-making in coastal management. The lack of a rigorous way to contribute to knowledge formation and decision-making in coastal management.

    Morecambe Area Gaming Environment (MAGE): An Applied Case Study for Coastal Futures and Adaptations · 2026 · DOI
  • The study highlights the need to quantify the contingency of reservoir performance on antecedent conditions.

    Antecedent storage governs downstream flood outcome at a flood-control reservoir: canyon dam, the 2002 and 2025 Guadalupe River floods, and the probable maximum flood · 2026 · DOI
  • Addressing under-canopy flood detection due to a lack of validation data.

    Large-scale flood monitoring based on time-series Sentinel-1 images and Z -score · 2026 · DOI
  • Validating simulated flows due to limited data availability. Identifying flood-affected road infrastructure and bridges with a probability of scour design exceedance greater than zero.

    Indirect costs of floods: a case study of highways road users · 2026 · DOI
  • Prior models have limitations, such as subjectivity and oversimplification of complex systems. There is a need for a more effective and accurate approach to evaluating and mapping urban pluvial flood susceptibility. The importance of incorporating drainage-related factors in urban flood susceptibility mapping has not been fully addressed.

    The Machine Learning-Based Mapping of Urban Pluvial Flood Susceptibility in Seoul Integrating Flood Conditioning Factors and Drainage-Related Data · 2025 · DOI
  • There is a need to conduct a comprehensive flash flood vulnerability assessment, incorporating multiple triggering factors. The study identifies a gap in the existing literature, where most studies focus on a single dimension of vulnerability. The integration of multiple dimensions of vulnerability is crucial for targeted disaster mitigation and response.

    Geospatial Approach to Assess Flash Flood Vulnerability in a Coastal District of Bangladesh: Integrating the Multifaceted Dimension of Vulnerabilities · 2025 · DOI
  • The need for objective evaluation methods to reduce the interference of subjective judgment. The challenge of revealing the spatial characteristics of urban flood resilience using spatial autocorrelation analysis.

    Urban Flood Resilience Assessment of Prefecture-Level Cities in Yangtze River Delta · 2025 · DOI
  • Limited previous research on urban flood resilience in the YRD. Most studies focus on the mechanisms of flood disasters and risk assessments, with little emphasis on quantifying urban flood resilience and conducting spatial correlation analysis. The need for a more comprehensive evaluation framework that considers socioeconomic development level and natural changes.

    Urban Flood Resilience Assessment of Prefecture-Level Cities in Yangtze River Delta · 2025 · DOI
  • Lack of research on large-scale basins and cities, especially ecologically sensitive areas with complex hydrological processes.

    A Comprehensive Modelling Framework for Identifying Green Infrastructure Layout in Urban Flood Management of the Yellow River Basin · 2025 · DOI
  • The lack of a comprehensive framework for assessing the equity of seismic shelter distribution in high-density urban environments. The need for a systematic and well-targeted urban disaster prevention framework to reduce losses. The limitation of traditional fairness definitions in terms of population coverage or demand satisfaction.

    Spatial Analysis and Fairness Evaluation of Seismic Emergency Shelter Distribution in High-Density Cities Based on GIS: A Case Study of Seoul · 2025 · DOI
  • The need for a comprehensive resilience evaluation model. The challenge of integrating SNA with a modified gravity model.

    Spatiotemporal Variation and Network Correlation Analysis of Flood Resilience in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration Based on the DRIRA Model · 2025 · DOI
  • The lack of a model that emphasizes dynamic interactions across the entire disaster lifecycle. The need for a model that integrates SNA with a modified gravity model. The absence of a comprehensive resilience evaluation model.

    Spatiotemporal Variation and Network Correlation Analysis of Flood Resilience in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration Based on the DRIRA Model · 2025 · DOI
  • The inherent limitations of conventional drainage infrastructure in historic urban areas are a challenge. The lack of standardized metrics for assessing resilience in historic urban areas and urban waterlogging disasters is a challenge.

    Comprehensive Assessment and Obstacle Factor Recognition of Waterlogging Disaster Resilience in the Historic Urban Area · 2025 · DOI
  • There is a lack of standardized metrics for assessing resilience in historic urban areas and urban waterlogging disasters. The study addresses the dimensional limitations in risk assessment by establishing architectural heritage as the core determinant of regional waterlogging disaster resilience.

    Comprehensive Assessment and Obstacle Factor Recognition of Waterlogging Disaster Resilience in the Historic Urban Area · 2025 · DOI
  • Fragmentation and lack of object-level semantic labels remain key challenges. There is a need for a transferable solution for constructing surface water classification datasets.

    A Low-Fragmentation Global Vector Dataset for River and Lake Classification of Surface Water Bodies · 2025 · DOI
  • The lack of public-domain datasets for pump station operations is a significant gap in current research. The need for more research on transfer learning and explainable artificial intelligence is another gap identified in the paper. The limited use of machine learning in real-time operations of flood control pumps is also a gap that needs to be addressed.

    Machine Learning for Flood Resiliency—Current Status and Unexplored Directions · 2025 · DOI
  • The paper does not explicitly state the research gap it aims to address. However, it mentions that floods are one of the most common and destructive phenomena observed worldwide and that flood modeling can help manage and minimize the effects of floods.

    Integration of HEC-RAS and HEC-HMS with GIS in Flood Modeling and Flood Hazard Mapping · 2024 · DOI
  • The lack of adequate sites and current legislation for environmental sustainability makes the construction of new large dams in industrialized countries not feasible. The need for improved water management and the incorporation of ecosystem protection and restoration into water resource management.

    Water Resources Management under Climate Change: A Review · 2024 · DOI
  • More detailed analyses of extreme hydrological events, such as exceptionally wet or dry years, - Consideration of flood modelling or climate variability scenarios, - Further optimisation of flood risk…

    Application of retention basins and on-contour swales for flood risk reduction · 2026 · DOI
  • Investigating the application of the proposed framework in other flood-prone regions. Examining the impact of different machine learning algorithms on the framework's performance.

    Integrating multi-criteria models into geospatial regression to explore spatially varying flood risk · 2026 · DOI
  • Other water body subtypes, such as wetlands, canals, and others, can be considered in future research - Potential directions for future research are discussed in detail in Section…

    A Low-Fragmentation Global Vector Dataset for River and Lake Classification of Surface Water Bodies · 2025 · DOI
  • Efforts to develop other open-source datasets would be useful to further test the use of ML in real-time operations of flood control…

    Machine Learning for Flood Resiliency—Current Status and Unexplored Directions · 2025 · DOI

Most-cited papers in Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Most recent work

Find a gap in your own Flood Risk Assessment and Management sub-topic

This page shows what the Flood Risk Assessment and Management literature already flags as unresolved. To narrow it to your specific question, search the Research Gap Finder: the search is free with a free account and lists the papers closest to your topic first. Unlocking that topic (50 credits, charged once) fills the comparison table from our 7.9M-paper local library and writes the gaps from its rows.

Open the Research Gap Finder →

Related topics in Environmental Science

Open questions raised by papers listed on this page include: (1) There is a need for a more comprehensive approach to flood risk management, considering multiple criteria (“Integrating multi-criteria models into geospatial regression to explore…”, 2026); (2) The lack of a rigorous way to contribute to knowledge formation and decision-making in coastal management (“Morecambe Area Gaming Environment (MAGE): An Applied Case Study for Coastal…”, 2026); (3) Addressing under-canopy flood detection due to a lack of validation data (“Large-scale flood monitoring based on time-series Sentinel-1 images and Z -score”, 2026); (4) There is a need for a more effective and accurate approach to evaluating and mapping urban pluvial flood susceptibility (“The Machine Learning-Based Mapping of Urban Pluvial Flood Susceptibility in…”, 2025); (5) There is a need to conduct a comprehensive flash flood vulnerability assessment, incorporating multiple triggering factors (“Geospatial Approach to Assess Flash Flood Vulnerability in a Coastal District…”, 2025). 941 gap statements have been mined from Flood Risk Assessment and Management papers in our 7.9M-paper local library, which holds 5,073 papers on the topic; the gaps come from whichever of those papers state one. They are mostly the research gaps the authors state and the papers' abstracts, plus future-work, limitations and challenges passages. The ones listed below are a selection still marked open; each names the study that raised it, with a DOI link where the paper has one, so you can read the original claim in context.

Tools for your next paper

How Pre-Check worksHow AI Review works

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.