Best open-access journals for Food Science
The top 40 of 70 Food Science journals, open-access only, ranked by Scimago quartile, then by whether OpenAlex and Scimago agree on the subject and how central Food Science is to each journal, then OpenAlex cites/paper (2-year window), leaving out journals both place in another discipline, drawn from a 17,782-venue index. Predatory venues are excluded; the FAQ below gives the exact ranking rule. These are field-wide rankings — for a shortlist matched to your specific paper, paste your title and abstract into the Journal Finder (a free account starts with 25 welcome credits).
- 1Current Research in Food Science6.9 cites/paper · Q1 · Elsevier BVOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 2
- 3Foods6.0 cites/paper · Q1 · Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7Journal of Agriculture and Food Research4.8 cites/paper · Q1 · Elsevier BVOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 8Fermentation4.6 cites/paper · Q1 · Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of Science
- 9International Journal of Food Science & Technology4.4 cites/paper · Q1 · WileyOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 10International Journal of Food Properties4.0 cites/paper · Q1 · Marcel DekkerOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of Science
- 11
- 12
- 13Applied Biological Chemistry5.1 cites/paper · Q1 · Springer NatureOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 14International Journal of Microbiology2.8 cites/paper · Q1 · Hindawi Publishing CorporationOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 15Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods4.1 cites/paper · Q2 · Codon PublicationsOpen AccessScopusWeb of Science
- 16Journal of Food Protection3.6 cites/paper · Q2 · Elsevier BVOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 17
- 18
- 19Beverages2.8 cites/paper · Q2 · Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 20Journal of Food Quality2.6 cites/paper · Q2 · Hindawi Publishing CorporationOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 21Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences2.0 cites/paper · Q2 · De Gruyter OpenOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 22
- 23Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal2.3 cites/paper · Q3Open AccessScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 24Brazilian Journal of Food Technology2.0 cites/paper · Q3 · Institute of Food TechnologyOpen AccessDOAJScopus
- 25
- 26Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Sciences1.1 cites/paper · Q3 · Slovak University of AgricultureOpen AccessScopusWeb of Science
- 27Czech Journal of Food Sciences1.1 cites/paper · Q3 · Czech Academy of Agricultural SciencesOpen AccessDOAJScopusWeb of Science
- 28Food Processing Techniques and Technology0.8 cites/paper · Q3 · Kemerovo State UniversityOpen AccessDOAJScopus
- 29Italian Journal of Food Safety0.7 cites/paper · Q3 · PAGEPress (Italy)Open AccessDOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- 30
- 31Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi0.5 cites/paper · Q3 · Ankara UniversityOpen AccessScopusTR-Dizin
- 32Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology0.3 cites/paper · Q4 · Korean Society of Food Science and TechnologyOpen AccessScopus
- 33Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi)0.2 cites/paper · Q4 · Japanese Society for Food Hygiene and SafetyOpen AccessScopusPubMed
- 34
- 35
- 36Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences2.3 cites/paper · no Scimago quartile · HACCP ConsultingOpen Access
- 37Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia1.8 cites/paper · no Scimago quartile · Oriental Scientific Publishing CompanyOpen Access
- 38EFSA Supporting Publications1.7 cites/paper · no Scimago quartile · European Food Safety AuthorityOpen Access
- 39International Journal of Sciences1.3 cites/paper · no Scimago quartile · Alkhaer PublicationsOpen AccessPubMed
- 40
“Cites/paper” is the OpenAlex 2-year citation rate — a transparent signal, not a licensed Impact Factor. Many regional and open-access journals are strong but aren’t covered by Scimago, so they show “no Scimago quartile”; that’s a coverage gap, not a quality judgement.